• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Anyone wanna play warcraft III: frozen throne? I'm up to level 35 RT now

Not a big fan of Warcraft 3 (although I own the game). Too many limitations, I especially hate the 50-unit-max, it really kills the game.
 
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Not a big fan of Warcraft 3 (although I own the game). Too many limitations, I especially hate the 50-unit-max, it really kills the game.

50 unit max?

you dont hit high upkeep till 80 units and the max is 100
 
3 vs 3 its really alot of units more then micro,

your level 35 in RT?
yeah I used to be at that level
but to arrange team, one needs alot of understanding,
maybe we can play someday.
will PM you.
 
well i've had a clan member who faced and army 30 acolytes rush on his base. within 2 minutes into the game.
needless to say he won that 1 vs 1 match
 
I don't see how you can knock Warcraft III because of unit limitations. It is online RTS perfection. It's free, game connections are instant, drop % is like 5%, games are like 25 minutes long.

Try Age of Empires or Rise of Nations. It takes 10 minutes to start a game because people are so bitchy about settings. Once in the game, there's tremendous lag. Given the length of a game (typically 1 hour+), at least one ally is likely to drop. You just wasted your time building an economy to die.
 
yes it doesn't hold you up for too long yet addictive,
but you can choose to stop after a game, not drag you on for hours
 
Back
Top