• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Anyone under 3 hour WU time ?

My average time on my OC'ed 1800+ is now at 3:15 but I have had 34 out of 274 results (since I started logging them) come in at under 3:00.
 
I have a box with OC'ed XP1600+ running at 1.585 GHz that consistently runs a HAR WU in 2h56m. The overall average per SetiQueue is 3h20m.

When I had WinXP Pro on this box the best time was 2h59m, but I went back to Win98SE and the time improved by 3 mins. But I got much better times with 3D Mark 2001 under WinXP Pro. With Geforce3 Ti200 I got a score of 6833 3D Marks, but with Win98SE it dropped to 5997. With both configurations I was using Det. 23.11 drivers.
 
I have a XP1700 OC'd to 1600 something, and it will occasionally do one under 3 hours. Usually around 3:20 though.
 
What JW said - I too am finding that running Win98SE can shave a couple minutes off of the WU time.. then again, I only have a couple single CPU boxes too. 😀

rolleye.gif


 
I have been getting WUs between 2:51 and 2:55 on VLARs above 1.1 with my OC 1900+ XP.

1600/1745 MHz
44C Temps

😀
 
i will be there!!!!!! just as soon as i set up my xp333-r with a xp2000........i should have a fast seti toy........uuuuuoooooo i cant wait........sub 3 min w/u's.....lol
 
Back
Top