Anyone running Norton Antivirus 2006 yet? Better or Worst then previous versions?

[ty1er]

nt


-ty1er

 

[ty1er]

bump^^

anyone?

 

[BlueWeasel]

Being Norton, I'd probably put my bet on worse.

 

[Schadenfroh]

Originally posted by: BlueWeasel
Being Norton, I'd probably put my bet on worse.

Can it get worse?

 

[dguy6789]

It probably takes up more ram, but it probably has a few new possibly useless features.

 

[n7]

I'm betting less than 1% of the users here will try it, lol

I know i won't be touching it.

 

[jadinolf]

Originally posted by: n7
I'm betting less than 1% of the users here will try it, lol

I know i won't be touching it.

You're right. I probably will but I have until next March before I will need it.

 

[NicColt]

ignore the weasels, Last month Norton offered me NIS2005 AntiSpy edition for $10 and it works fine. Can't comment on 06 since I don't have it though.

 

[ty1er]

^^ bump ^^

 

[Rottie]

So far Norton AV 2005 is better for me..upgraded from NAV 2002. Some people said NAV 2004 is better than others.

 

[Cpt. Duke]

If I were you, I would consider purchasing a single version of Symantec Corporate Antivirus version 10. It uses far less resources than the Home version known as Norton Antivirus.