anyone own a 3D tv?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
In games I feel it does add another level of immersion though. I understand there is 3D porn too though :hmm:

I think the problem with games is that they're not taking full advantage of it as much as they could be. I think it's partly because games can be a group experience, and having glasses for a full group can be... kind of expensive unless you have passive 3D.

For example, when I was playing Super Stardust HD, I thought it'd be nifty if it pushed the globe out of the screen. The globe just turns, so there isn't much movement past rotation. All the game does is put a few twinkles in 3D and the background is in 3D. I assume this is similar to Mortal Kombat (3D on the PS3). I read an article where they said that they purposely made the characters 2D so with or without glasses, you could still see the action. It makes sense, but if others take this approach, could they lose immersive possibilities?

Shadow of the Colossus & Ico as well as the God of War Origins collection are coming out next month, and both of them will feature 3D. I'm curious how good it will be.
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
43
91
I think the problem with games is that they're not taking full advantage of it as much as they could be. I think it's partly because games can be a group experience, and having glasses for a full group can be... kind of expensive unless you have passive 3D.

For example, when I was playing Super Stardust HD, I thought it'd be nifty if it pushed the globe out of the screen. The globe just turns, so there isn't much movement past rotation. All the game does is put a few twinkles in 3D and the background is in 3D. I assume this is similar to Mortal Kombat (3D on the PS3). I read an article where they said that they purposely made the characters 2D so with or without glasses, you could still see the action. It makes sense, but if others take this approach, could they lose immersive possibilities?

Shadow of the Colossus & Ico as well as the God of War Origins collection are coming out next month, and both of them will feature 3D. I'm curious how good it will be.

Many games out now were not designed with 3D in mind. You can render them in 3D but they may look sub par or there may even be aspects that are broken. On screen HUDs are particularly prone to "break" in 3D.

I've been thinking more of the 3DS titles I've played. None of them blow me away and I wouldn't say 3D is a game changer. However after a while I definitely find myself wanting to keep the 3D slider on instead of off. Just finished Zelda OoT in 3D. It just adds another small level of immersion, and that's almost always a good thing.
 

orion23

Platinum Member
Oct 1, 2003
2,035
0
71
I bought a 3D tv back in december.
Needed an upgrade from my 32" and decided to buy a new TV. 3D was an added bonus.

Games in 3D are amazing. Black OPS, Kill Zone 3, Motorstorm and almost any PC game using 3D technology such as Tridef.
Some movies are amazing, like tangled, how to train your dragon, but the best quality, IMO, comes from the Imax films; under the water, space station....

A 3D tv is still a normal TV, but with the 3D option, and with the right content, it could be amazing!

I love mine!
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
^ What really sucks is all these exclusive deals that are making it hard to get 3d content.

Stupid move by the TV makers.

If everyone could buy Avatar or How to Train your Dragon you would see more sales because there would be more top notch content available.

Right now the best 3d on the market can't be bought unless you buy their TV and many other big name titles are the same way.

Just making the Pixar, Shrek and other 3d animated movies available would be a huge kick to the market. Perhaps by Christmas. Maybe this year will be the year for 3d TV, we can only hope.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,090
136
oh, and if your mind was "literally" blown away, your brain matter and skull fragments would literally be on Best Buy's floor right now.

come on people, can we stop with this "literally" crap right now?

To be honest, when I hear "XXX literally XXX" in that way; I simply look at it like hyperbole as in "XXX literally (not to be taken literally) XXX." So it doesn't really bother me that much, however, I never use the phrase myself.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Many games out now were not designed with 3D in mind. You can render them in 3D but they may look sub par or there may even be aspects that are broken. On screen HUDs are particularly prone to "break" in 3D.

I've been thinking more of the 3DS titles I've played. None of them blow me away and I wouldn't say 3D is a game changer. However after a while I definitely find myself wanting to keep the 3D slider on instead of off. Just finished Zelda OoT in 3D. It just adds another small level of immersion, and that's almost always a good thing.

We've been talking about this very thing in the 3D thread in PC Gaming, and it seems the one thing you have to keep in mind is that not all games are actually programmed with being "3D-ized" in mind. Like you mentioned, certain things such as HUDs and other 2D portions sometimes will not show up correctly unless the game has been designed to work with 3D.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,095
30,041
146
To be honest, when I hear "XXX literally XXX" in that way; I simply look at it like hyperbole as in "XXX literally (not to be taken literally) XXX." So it doesn't really bother me that much, however, I never use the phrase myself.

well, that's why people use it, I think. They mean it as hyperbole, when it is completely unnecessary/improper as hyperbole.

literally, simply, means literally.

hyperbole needs nothing for emphasis.

I could eat an elephant!

seriously, wtf needs to hear "literally" in front of that to understand that the moron is not being serious?

idiots.
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
43
91
well, that's why people use it, I think. They mean it as hyperbole, when it is completely unnecessary/improper as hyperbole.

literally, simply, means literally.

hyperbole needs nothing for emphasis.

I could eat an elephant!

seriously, wtf needs to hear "literally" in front of that to understand that the moron is not being serious?

idiots.

Maybe they want to commit suicide by overeating and they are thinking of choosing "elephant" as the food to do it by. Then they would quite literally eat a whole elephant. :colbert:
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
I am going to get 3D glasses via cornea transplants so I don't heed the glasses.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,095
30,041
146
Maybe they want to commit suicide by overeating and they are thinking of choosing "elephant" as the food to do it by. Then they would quite literally eat a whole elephant. :colbert:

the expression is only used when someone is hungry, damn it! not trying to commit suicide.

How about this, when some idiot says: "I'm literally starving to death!"

what this message conveys to people who aren't idiots: "You are watching me die. I am 3 minutes from death, by starvation. Seriously, watch me die right here, because we are passed the threshold; Modern medicine and/or Jesus/Allah can not save me now as I am now in the death rattle."

idiots
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
43
91
the expression is only used when someone is hungry, damn it! not trying to commit suicide.

How about this, when some idiot says: "I'm literally starving to death!"

what this message conveys to people who aren't idiots: "You are watching me die. I am 3 minutes from death, by starvation. Seriously, watch me die right here, because we are passed the threshold; Modern medicine and/or Jesus/Allah can not save me now as I am now in the death rattle."

idiots

You are literally boring me to death. ;)
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
I really do think the biggest appeal to me is playing PS3 games in 3D like Killzone and Black Ops.

That alone makes me tempted to get a 3D TV.

There's just no way I can justify doing so though since my living room TV isn't that old and works great.
 

ghost recon88

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2005
6,196
1
81
I refuse to give in to the 3-D craze.

3DTV sucks ass, I have a Sony Bravia at just under 50in and it sucks as bad as it does in theaters, just a gimmick, and a shitty one at that

Yep, current 3D technology is all hype, it might have some substance to it once they can do 3D without needing any glasses. Notice 3D comes and goes every 10-15 years starting back in the 80s. This current fad will die soon too I hope. If one is thinking about buying into the current 3D technology, "A fool and his money are easily parted".
 

flvinny521

Member
Jul 29, 2011
111
0
0
I have a model year 2010 58" Samsung plasma with 3D, but I have literally (really, literally) never used it. It's an incredible TV without it. I knew that I wasn't going to use the feature when I bought it.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
If I were buying a TV today I'd buy a 3D one - 3D sets are pretty much always the best plasma/LCD sets. I do have an Oppo BDP-93 blu ray player that is 3D-capable, so I'm sure I'd at least try it if I had one, but I can't imagine I'd use the 3D feature often. I am still happy with my nearly 6-year-old Samsung 720p DLP TV (still on its original bulb!), so I feel no burning desire to buy a new set anytime soon.
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
43
91
If I were buying a TV today I'd buy a 3D one - 3D sets are pretty much always the best plasma/LCD sets. I do have an Oppo BDP-93 blu ray player that is 3D-capable, so I'm sure I'd at least try it if I had one, but I can't imagine I'd use the 3D feature often. I am still happy with my nearly 6-year-old Samsung 720p DLP TV (still on its original bulb!), so I feel no burning desire to buy a new set anytime soon.

While I'm sure many if not most of the 3D sets are very good I'd be surprised if all the best panels out there are 3D as well. They have to spend money to produce a 120Hz capable unit. Usually the highest end, best quality, electronics are rather conservative in their feature set. Do a small number of things perfectly, don't try to be jack of all trades.
 

SandEagle

Lifer
Aug 4, 2007
16,809
13
0
actually, i will just wait for the Black Friday deals. Black Friday in Detroit sucks balls. Almost got into a fight a few years ago
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
actually, i will just wait for the Black Friday deals. Black Friday in Detroit sucks balls. Almost got into a fight a few years ago

I think they're trying to advise you to stop spending money so frivolously. :p Consider taking my "How much do I need this?" approach. Whenever you see a dollar price, multiply it by a need factor (1x = fairly necessary, 5x = would be nice to have). If your TV isn't broken and you already have HD, but not 3D... I think you could consider that a 4x or 5x expenditure.

Of course, buying that new AVR was probably against my own need factor approach, but I didn't buy it on credit. :p
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
I just scored 2 more pairs of 3d glasses and all the Shrek movies in 3d for $97 shipped. Looks like soon I'll have seen more than one movie in 3d on my TV. :D
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
43
91
I just scored 2 more pairs of 3d glasses and all the Shrek movies in 3d for $97 shipped. Looks like soon I'll have seen more than one movie in 3d on my TV. :D

I don't want my movies in 3D! But if I have to I'll wait till they have autostereoscopic 3D working well on large screens.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
I don't want my movies in 3D! But if I have to I'll wait till they have autostereoscopic 3D working well on large screens.

Did you somehow misconstrue what I said as an invitation to my house to watch 3d movies?