I think I kind of get the jist of it, but would love some confirmation. This would be to cool aquariums.
One side gets cold, the other side gets hot. The more you can cool the hot side, the colder the cold side can get.
So, in the aquarium setting, I would attach the cold side of the thermoelectric cooler to the glass (how - some kind of glue? Any ideas best kind?). I would mount on the hot side as big a heat sink as I could fit. Then likely mount a fan on that heat sink to help IT keep cool.
Does that sound about right? ANyone know of any good, cheap pre-made units that would work on an aquarium? How efficient are they generally from a watt perspective? In other words, instead of going that route, if I were instead just to get some fans that blow into/accross the top of the water, increasing evaporation, might those have a per-watt cooling effect more than the thermoelectric cooler approach?
Thanks!
One side gets cold, the other side gets hot. The more you can cool the hot side, the colder the cold side can get.
So, in the aquarium setting, I would attach the cold side of the thermoelectric cooler to the glass (how - some kind of glue? Any ideas best kind?). I would mount on the hot side as big a heat sink as I could fit. Then likely mount a fan on that heat sink to help IT keep cool.
Does that sound about right? ANyone know of any good, cheap pre-made units that would work on an aquarium? How efficient are they generally from a watt perspective? In other words, instead of going that route, if I were instead just to get some fans that blow into/accross the top of the water, increasing evaporation, might those have a per-watt cooling effect more than the thermoelectric cooler approach?
Thanks!