ManBearPig
Diamond Member
I can get it for like $90 cheaper!
Last edited:
The intels had an issue with some drives being bricked. I think that issue has been resolved (although I'm not 100% sure). Both drives are considered good buys as far as reliability goes.
Crucial is a SATA III - Intel is a SATA II. Thus you really can not compare SATA III vs SATA II.
If I tell ya do you promise NOT to give advice on Anand's computer forums?My dads A-DATA SSD that came with his comp is 120GB SATA 3 , it gives out 385mbps ,,, What does this mean, should I change his BIOS to AHCI , Im scared to do so and windowz doesnt boot, I cant flak with his machine. cuz SATA 3 should pump near 500mbps. Thank you
newegg has the 320 80GB for $80
If I tell ya do you promise NOT to give advice on Anand's computer forums?
lol the same thing crossed my mind.
Yeah, it's almost TOO hard to resist the 320 at those prices. Intel is literally having a blow-out. And I really was waiting for a good deal on the M4.
I'm still seeing lots of reports of BSODs and problems even after the new firmware, so I'm gonna hold out. Its really, really tempting but I cant deal with BSODs/RMAs, etc.
Ughhhhhhhh.......damnit, now i dont know what to do! If i wont notice the speed difference between the two maybe i should just go for the cheaper intel?
The speed differences between tier 1 SSDs are not worth talking about, unless you know you have a workload that would benefit from the faster SSD (and if you knew, you wouldn't be on a forum asking).
Intel is top of the market in reliability. Crucial is right up there with them, but Intel is inarguably the best. When SSDs are so far beyond HDDs in performance, squabbling about SATA2 vs. SATA3 is pointless.
As was mentioned, Intel SSDs at these prices are absolute *steals*.
Thanks all, I guess I will go with the Intel then! Unless i get a weird feeling that its not reliable...because i keep reading about how the old firmware was messed up and some claim its still not fixed. 🙁