Originally posted by: DurocShark
You're in for more maintenance with a smaller tank than a larger one. 150gal + tanks you can spend months just adding calcium, traces, and RO water. But smaller ones need massive water chagnes. (From my experience with a range of sizes...)
I personally prefer the 20 gal "micro" reef tanks. More interesting to me, and less house space is involved.
Originally posted by: jinduy
damn iwas figuring it would cost around $500 in the first 3-6 months for a 50 gallon reef tank... but more than $3k ?
-___-
Originally posted by: selene
I been keeping guppies/goldfish for long time now... since '88.. I can never afford the time + cash for a reef tank... it is very very expensive and demanding !
Why didn't he move up? Arrowanas are friggin expensive...Originally posted by: FuZioN
my dad killed like $400 worth of fishes... and this was with simple fresh water fishes lol.
those arowana fishes and other expensive crap.
cant imagine the pain in the arse with reef tanks
Yes! A big part of the allure of keeping an aquarium is the idea of recreating an entire ecosystem in a box. If you just want a decoration, it's probably not a good fit for you.Successful reefs require your understanding of the underlying chemcial and biochemical mechanisms.
No, what I have is a romantic abnormality, one so unbelievable that it must be hidden from the public at all cost.