Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
i have franken at the common wealth club and the terry gross interview of oreilly in mp3. i can't host it though, someone else would have to. files 50mb each
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I liked the way O pumped himself up by dropping the names of important people who've beed on his show. He should have taken a look at the folks who have been on hers.
Originally posted by: BigJelly
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I liked the way O pumped himself up by dropping the names of important people who've beed on his show. He should have taken a look at the folks who have been on hers.
funny ive never heard of her before Oreilly went on the show.
Like that would be a surprise.Originally posted by: BigJelly
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I liked the way O pumped himself up by dropping the names of important people who've beed on his show. He should have taken a look at the folks who have been on hers.
funny ive never heard of her before Oreilly went on the show.
Conclusion, Oreilly and the NPR host battled with wits and the smartest person won--Oreilly. For those who don't believe that, listen to what Oreilly got the host to admit:
1.) she was soft on Frankin
2.) she called frankin's book satire , but its obvious to a non-bias person it is political mudslinging
3.) she admitted she treated Oreilly differently (much more harshly)
Therefore, Oreilly proved she was bias and therefore not looking out for you, the viewers, or fair and balenced reporting.
Originally posted by: Lucky
why is she continually trying to bait orielly with franken material?
there is a clear difference in her mannerism and questioning around the 18 minute mark and after the misguided "spin" question. The questions about the war, format of the show, political views of this that would surpise people, his childhood-all interesting and suited to the interview I think. Seems like maybe she needed some time to regroup herself-she starts drawing some quotes from his book instead of others which makes sense given the interview is around his book.
also, at the 31:30 marks she says "now here's the conlusion"....did she cut something there or was that just a seemingly abrupt continuation line?
"If you can't tell this is a defamatory book, then you can't read"
In other words, if you don't agree with me you are an idiot.
Fair and Balanced? BWHAHAH!!!! The whole world is out to get him. Some woman wrote a review of Michael Moores book, calling it a "bumper sticker". In his opinion, that makes a favorable review.
You are honestly saying that frankin's book does not defame oreilly? that much of it's content is not negative so-called "satire"?
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
You are honestly saying that frankin's book does not defame oreilly? that much of it's content is not negative so-called "satire"?
look up the definition to defame. its attacks through libel or slander, which means by definition to defame the charges must be untrue. since oreilly can't defend himself against these charges and instead retorts with personal attacks while running around the truth, they must be true. not defamation.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
You are honestly saying that frankin's book does not defame oreilly? that much of it's content is not negative so-called "satire"?
look up the definition to defame. its attacks through libel or slander, which means by definition to defame the charges must be untrue. since oreilly can't defend himself against these charges and instead retorts with personal attacks while running around the truth, they must be true. not defamation.
he gave several examples of falsities that franken perpetuated in his book in the npr interview.
Originally posted by: Lucky
"If you can't tell this is a defamatory book, then you can't read"
In other words, if you don't agree with me you are an idiot.
You are honestly saying that frankin's book does not defame oreilly? that much of it's content is not negative so-called "satire"?
Fair and Balanced? BWHAHAH!!!! The whole world is out to get him. Some woman wrote a review of Michael Moores book, calling it a "bumper sticker". In his opinion, that makes a favorable review.
to be fair he admitted several times that he could be wrong and that he would re-read the review.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
working audio link.
http://freshair.npr.org/day_fa.jhtml?todayDate=current
link credit goes to friedpie
he gave several examples of falsities that franken perpetuated in his book in the npr interview.