Anyone have their benchmarks on 3dmark03 with aa/af on?

FluxCap

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2002
1,207
0
0
I was just curious because this weekend I ran 3DMARK03 with 4xAA and 8xAF on and got a 2950. I at first thought my card had messed up until I remembered aa/af were on.

Also, my non AA/AF score is 5470. Is this ok for a 2ghz processor? I am starting to wonder for some reason if I should be getting higher.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
cpu has nothing to do with 3dmark2003. whats your video?

and plus is your 2 ghz an athlon or an intel? HUGE difference...
 

FluxCap

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2002
1,207
0
0
Sounds about right. It explains why I get destroyed by a 3ghz machine with a 9800 Pro in 2001 but am very close in 2003.
 

Slammy1

Platinum Member
Apr 8, 2003
2,112
0
76
Never tried with AA on (AF shouldn't affect results), but I got 5450 running with a single instance of Prime95 (usually run 5850-5900). What's your video o/c? Sounds about right for default 9800.
 

Slammy1

Platinum Member
Apr 8, 2003
2,112
0
76
You're right where you should be, maybe even 50-100 points high compared to what I've seen in others. I started to run 4XAA, but the performance was so bad I stopped it during Battle for Proxycon.
 

The Wildcard

Platinum Member
Oct 31, 1999
2,743
0
0
Hmm i got 2924 with a 9800 Pro with 4X AA and 4X AF. I have a p4 1.6a oc'd to 2.1ghz.

I get 5435 with those two settings turned off.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
Originally posted by: 1ManArmY
Aren't 3DmarK 2003 scores 90% Video Card and 10% CPU?

Yes but you are forgetting that 2003 3Dmarks is 100% sh*t.

 

FluxCap

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2002
1,207
0
0
Until there is something better that is what we have to run for benchmarks I think. :brokenheart: