Actually, you didn't show that Ballistix can run stably at the specified speeds, so bringing it to a close seems awfully premature.
To demonstrate the memory works as expected, I still want to see:
1) 12 hour Prime95 test.
2) 3 hour 3d game testing.
3) multiple loops memtest86 (for lauy)
4) 250Mhz 1:1 memory specification
5) >6000 Sandra score (otherwise, why bother with Ballistix at all?)
I don't care about memory latencies so much, I personally don't require 2-2-2, because it doesn't affect the Sandra bandwidth that much. But, the 1T setting is a must, regardless of whether it's a memory setting or a motherboard setting.
If Ballistix cannot run those settings, then it's a poor choice for this board. Simple as that. (A bad value, in that the performance does not warrant the price.)
I'm not trying to slag Ballistix either, and if you demonstrate they work as specified, then I'm sure other readers and I will be _very_ interested. So far, you have failed at that task, which still leads me to believe that there is a problem.
From your prior post, If you can set this up:
HTb Frequency @ 600MHz or @800 - 16bit/16bit (at 3x or 4x, either is fine)
HTT/FSB = 250MHz
CPU Multiplier @ 10 (10*250MHz=2.5GHz) CPU voltage 1.45v (up to 1.6v OK)
Memory 1:1 @ 2.5-4-4-8 (3-4-4-10 OK too)
2T Command Rate: Disabled
AGP/PCI manually set to 66.66/33.33MHz
And then succeed at my tests above, then you've got a winner.
Please do those tests, and let us know. I for one would be interested in switching from my Corsair if you can demonstrate success.
Thanks,
bo3bber