• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Anyone have a P4 3ghz or an Athlon 2800+?

Miramonti

Lifer
If so, you can do me a big favor. 🙂

I'm considering upgrading to one of these and I'd like to see how my CPUmark '99 file does running on each of these processors. Its a single file, 500k and takes about 20 seconds. I've been using it on my different pentium and amd machines for a few years and would like to get a score for comparison on each of these processors.

I know its not a perfect test, I'm reading plenty of threads and benchmark stats about the two, but I'd really like to see what score this utility gets. Post what you get here. Thx!

Download Cpumark (top) and some benchmark scores
 
Originally posted by: jjsole
If so, you can do me a big favor. 🙂

I'm considering upgrading to one of these and I'd like to see how my CPUmark '99 file does running on each of these processors. Its a single file, 500k and takes about 20 seconds. I've been using it on my different pentium and amd machines for a few years and would like to get a score for comparison on each of these processors.

I know its not a perfect test, I'm reading plenty of threads and benchmark stats about the two, but I'd really like to see what score this utility gets.

<STRONG>PM me</STRONG> with your email if I can send you the file (cpumark.exe) to run.

Is it me, or would the results of this test vary greatly with mobo and ram?
 
they'd vary but I don't think they'd vary 'greatly' unless its o/c'd. Like I said its not a perfect test but I want to see what numbers can be gotten.
 
CPUmark99 doesn't have a huge memory footprint so it is mainly cpu dependent, you won't find much difference in scores for the same cpu.

I like this bench as well, although outdated, it gives a quick idea of overall cpu "strength," disregarding SSE, SSEII, 3D Now!, etc...

It is a nice way to see how all of your systems compare because it has been around so long.

I doubt you'll find anyone with those cpu's around here who will run the test. I have a pretty extensive database of CPUmark99 scores. I don't have the cpu's you mention but I have P4's up to 2.4 and some Athlon XP's.

By extrapolating, it looks like the results would be about:

P4 3.06 CPUmark99 - 200

XP 2800+ CPUmark99 - 190

Remember that the P4 will be better in apps that use SSEII and the Athlon will be better in apps that don't since it has a better fpu. Also keep in mind that CPUmark99 does not test fpu performance.

Hope that helps.
 
Originally posted by: Hulk
CPUmark99 doesn't have a huge memory footprint so it is mainly cpu dependent, you won't find much difference in scores for the same cpu. I like this bench as well, although outdated, it gives a quick idea of overall cpu "strength," disregarding SSE, SSEII, 3D Now!, etc... It is a nice way to see how all of your systems compare because it has been around so long. I doubt you'll find anyone with those cpu's around here who will run the test. I have a pretty extensive database of CPUmark99 scores. I don't have the cpu's you mention but I have P4's up to 2.4 and some Athlon XP's. By extrapolating, it looks like the results would be about: P4 3.06 CPUmark99 - 200 XP 2800+ CPUmark99 - 190 Remember that the P4 will be better in apps that use SSEII and the Athlon will be better in apps that don't since it has a better fpu. Also keep in mind that CPUmark99 does not test fpu performance. Hope that helps.
This machine/software is used exclusively for crunching numbers all day. Sounds like it would perform better on a relative basis with the athlon's better fpu resources. I'm hoping (dreaming?) to get higher numbers than that tho to justify an upgrade. 🙁

Thx for the info. Good to know someone else likes this Cpumark proggy too...good little utility. 🙂

 
About as useful as MIPS in my mind... which is to say completely useless.
Nonetheless, results for you...

AMD AthlonXP 2800+ scored 197
Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz scored 200

AXP was on a KT400 based mainboard, P4 on an I850E.

Would have posted sooner but I was off work for a few days so I didnt have access to such processors at home.
 
Got a 210 on an Athlon XP 2100+ @ 175x13 (2275mhz) which is 25mhz higher then the 2800+, but running at a FSB which is 9mhz higher.
 
Wow, those are some amazing scores. CPUmark99 is nice to see where we've been:

Chip CPUmark99 Speed
486 DX2-66 2.6 66
AMD 586 5.2 150
Pentium 200 11.9 200
Cyrix 6x86MX PR200 13.5 166
Winchip 2-3D 13.9 225
Pentium MMX 14.9 233
K6 18 233
Pentium Pro 19.6 200
Cyrix M II/400 300MHz 25.6 300
Celeron 333 (PC Mag) 27 333
K6-2 400 (PC Mag) 28 400
K6-2 475 (PC Mag) 28.3 475
K6-2-450 (PC Mag) 28.6 450
Celeron 400 (PC Mag) 30.9 400
PII 450 (PC Mag) 34.1 450
Celeron 466 (my test) 34.2 466
PIII 450 (PC Mag) 34.6 450
Celeron 466 (PC Mag) 34.8 466
Celeron 450A (my test) 36.1 450
Celeron 500 (PC Mag) 36.1 500
Celeron 450 (my test) 38 450
PIII 500 (PC Mag) 38.2 500
PIII 550 (PC Mag) 40.6 550
K6 III 400 (PC Mag) 43.4 400
PIII 600 (PC Mag) 44.1 600
PIII Xeon 550 (PC Mag) 45.4 550
K6 III 450 (PC Mag) 48.1 450
Athlon 550 (PC Mag) 51.9 550
Celeron II 800 (my test) 53.4 800
Athlon 600 (PC Mag) 56 600
Celeron 900 (my test) 56.9 900
Athlon 650 (PC Mag) 60 650
Duron 1000 (Morgan) 72.8 1000
PIII 850 (my test) 76.1 850
P4 1.5 SDRAM (my test) 89.6 1500
P4 1.5 DDR 92.2 1500
P4 1.8 DDR 108 1800
P4 2.0 DDR 118 2000
P4 2.0A DDR 123 2000
P4 2.2 DDR 134 2200
Duron 1000 desktop 72.2 1000
Duron 1000 notebook 61.7 1000
PIII 1000 notebook battery63.4 733
PIII 1000 notebook wall 86.1 1000
Athlon XP 1600+ 117 1400
Compaq EVO n600c (800MHz)77.9 800
Compaq EVO n600c (1200MHz)111 1200
P4 1.9 SDRAM (my test) 106 1900
P4 2.4 333DDR (my test) 157 2400
P3 2.53 333DDR 165 2533
Athlon XP2800+ 197 2250
P4 3.06 on 850E 200 3066
Athlon XP2100+ @2275 210 2275
P4 2.4B o/c @3350 215 3350


 
I got 148 with my AthlonXP 1900+ running completely stock on my KT333 board. The score sucks but I can game. 🙂
 
I just got a 215, its a 2.4B @ 3.35 GHz with a Abit IT7 Max2 V2.0
nice o/c. 😀
486 DX2-66 2.6 66
dang, things sure have come a long way (thank god!). Thats a good timeline. The first machine that I bought for myself was a a 450/p3, and I think that was 36. That was cookin too. 😉

thanks for posting the scores guys, I've been dying to see what this would get...no its not a perfect reference, but I find it still relevant.
 
Back
Top