Originally posted by: AndyD2k
well, i wouldn't be upgrading from a amd 3500. It would be from a 2700. I'm just trying to decide between the two and was just wondering if there is any real benefit to justify the extra cost. Figured the best way to figure this one out would be to ask those who have actually made the switch from a 3500.
Originally posted by: theman
are you upgrading your entire system, or just the cpu?
Originally posted by: Promethply
Originally posted by: AndyD2k
well, i wouldn't be upgrading from a amd 3500. It would be from a 2700. I'm just trying to decide between the two and was just wondering if there is any real benefit to justify the extra cost. Figured the best way to figure this one out would be to ask those who have actually made the switch from a 3500.
You'd be better off getting the Venice 3200+ and OC it -- it'll at least reach 2400MHz, and many people has successfully reach beyond 2600MHz with this baby.
Originally posted by: AndyD2k
Originally posted by: Promethply
You'd be better off getting the Venice 3200+ and OC it -- it'll at least reach 2400MHz, and many people has successfully reach beyond 2600MHz with this baby.
I'm not the overclocking type. I don't like the idea of having to worry about my sys and something going wrong. Plus, wouldn't I have to worry about the extra heat produced? Finally, the 3500 Venice can't be OC'd in the same way.
Was thinking of buying a amd 3800 but I'm not sure if the $100+ extra over the 3200 is worth it.
