Anyone getting tired of this traitor yet?

[Winchester]

Textbook Traitor

She should not ever be allowed back on American soil except when being immediately placed in shackles.


Wrong Forum

 

[KarenMarie]

She lost all credability here so she had to go on foreign soil to make the headlines.

she is washed up.

 

[moshquerade]

idiot

 

[Elderly Newt]

Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

 

[AStar617]

I agree 100%... but why is this in ATOT and not P&N?

 

[Pocatello]

She wants to run for the Senate? So the publicity stunts are just politics after all. She should go and visit Fidel Castro, that should get her a lot of support from Berkeley.

 

[Winchester]

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: AStar617
I agree 100%... but why is this in ATOT and not P&N?

because P&N thinks she's all that and bag of cornnuts.

 

[mjh]

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

haha?

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: Pocatello
She wants to run for the Senate? So the publicity stunts are just politics after all. She should go and visit Fidel Castro, that should get her a lot of support from Berkeley.

she is strongly considering challenging democratic senator Dianne Feinstein

 

[PlatinumGold]

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

so when our govt funds foreign govt (Iraq) etc that is somehow better than what she did?

just because they are elected officials, it doesn't mean that they are held to a different standard. if what she did is traitorous than many of our presidents have also been traitorous.

 

[loup garou]

Wrong forum.

 

[whistleclient]

Originally posted by: Winchester
Textbook Traitor

She should not ever be allowed back on American soil except when being immediately placed in shackles.

Actually, I'm tired of people like you-- people who don't understand that being an American means having FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

She disagrees with you. Get over it.

 

[whistleclient]

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

use hyperbole much?

 

[Winchester]

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

so when our govt funds foreign govt (Iraq) etc that is somehow better than what she did?

just because they are elected officials, it doesn't mean that they are held to a different standard. if what she did is traitorous than many of our presidents have also been traitorous.

We fund allies. Sometimes those allies turn around and bite us and therefore become enemies, hence, WWI, WWII, and so on.

 

[uhohs]

Hugo Chavez, his arm around Sheehan's shoulders, told a group of activists that Sheehan had told him that during Holy Week, in April, "she is going to put up her tent again in front of Mr. Danger's ranch."

MR. DANGER
ROFL
awesome

 

[mjh]

Then perhaps the U.S. government should pick its allies a bit better in the future. i.e. Shah of Iran and Augusto Pinochet were such nice and caring people.

I guess it's time to get back to the OP. Although I don't agree with Sheehan, I don't necessarily consider her a traitor.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: tangent1138

Originally posted by: Winchester
Textbook Traitor

She should not ever be allowed back on American soil except when being immediately placed in shackles.

Actually, I'm tired of people like you-- people who don't understand that being an American means having FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

She disagrees with you. Get over it.

so in other words you don't think the OP should have freedom of speech?

 

[Winchester]

Originally posted by: tangent1138

Originally posted by: Winchester
Textbook Traitor

She should not ever be allowed back on American soil except when being immediately placed in shackles.

Actually, I'm tired of people like you-- people who don't understand that being an American means having FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

She disagrees with you. Get over it.

This post has nothing to do about freedom of speech.

Just to play along though: If a soldier/civilian goes and tells the enemy the planned course of actions that we are about to take (AKA spy), is this too called free speech? They are American citizens, its "free speech", whats the difference? You tell me.

 

[Crazee]

Venezuela is not an enemy of the US :roll: We are not at war with Venezuela unless somehow the idiot Pat Robertson has some official position in our government.

You can't call it collaborating with the enemy just because our President doesn't like their President.

 

[PlatinumGold]

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

so when our govt funds foreign govt (Iraq) etc that is somehow better than what she did?

just because they are elected officials, it doesn't mean that they are held to a different standard. if what she did is traitorous than many of our presidents have also been traitorous.

We fund allies. Sometimes those allies turn around and bite us and therefore become enemies, hence, WWI, WWII, and so on.

wrong, often we fund the least bad among the bad (judgement call at best) and in the case of Iraq, guess what it was bad judgement.

how is what she did any different?

get over, it's FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

 

[Winchester]

Originally posted by: mjh
Then perhaps the U.S. government should pick its allies a bit better in the future. i.e. Shah of Iran and Augusto Pinochet were such nice and caring people.

If everyone knew how their investments would turn out we would all be in the stock market now wouldnt we.

 

[moshquerade]

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: PlatinumGold

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: Elderly Newt
Except we have freedom of speech in America, so I don't know how well that would hold up.

There is a difference between collaborating with an enemy of the United States and free speech. Her actions are no different than if she went and fought beside Osama. She has now done the same thing.

so when our govt funds foreign govt (Iraq) etc that is somehow better than what she did?

just because they are elected officials, it doesn't mean that they are held to a different standard. if what she did is traitorous than many of our presidents have also been traitorous.

We fund allies. Sometimes those allies turn around and bite us and therefore become enemies, hence, WWI, WWII, and so on.

wrong, often we fund the least bad among the bad (judgement call at best) and in the case of Iraq, guess what it was bad judgement.

how is what she did any different?

get over, it's FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

i don't see where anyone is denying the bitch freedom of speech.

 

[mjh]

Originally posted by: Winchester

Originally posted by: mjh
Then perhaps the U.S. government should pick its allies a bit better in the future. i.e. Shah of Iran and Augusto Pinochet were such nice and caring people.

If everyone knew how their investments would turn out we would all be in the stock market now wouldnt we.

Fair enough, but wasn't Salvador Allende (the president of Chile before Pinochet) democratically elected? Helping Pinochet get rid of him probably wasn't the best idea.

Global politics is a dirty game, and I believe Sheehan has already started her career "nicely".

 

[NakaNaka]

I had respect for her at first. Now it's all gone.