Originally posted by: igowerf
The SAT's dont really show anything. Anyone can get some flash cards or a book and easily score at least 1300. It's too bad that we value them so much. I heard that the University of California schools don't really look at SAT I's anymore though. Is that true?
Originally posted by: zippy
No, you're not a genius.Originally posted by: roncarter
1540 here ..no joke
what can i say. im a genious
Anyway, I took the SATs in May of 2002 - got a 1480 (750 verbal, 730 math - I got a 730 on Math even though I only missed 3 questions, go figure).
Heh, I said he isn't a genius because, like you, he spelled it 'genious.' 🙂 Anyway, good work.Originally posted by: boLbim33
Originally posted by: zippy
No, you're not a genius.Originally posted by: roncarter
1540 here ..no joke
what can i say. im a genious
Anyway, I took the SATs in May of 2002 - got a 1480 (750 verbal, 730 math - I got a 730 on Math even though I only missed 3 questions, go figure).
Haha- i'm more geniouser than you. i get me a 1490 (800 math, 690 verbal) . . . oh- me ingrish not as good as me math.
Originally posted by: boLbim33
Originally posted by: zippy
No, you're not a genius.
Anyway, I took the SATs in May of 2002 - got a 1480 (750 verbal, 730 math - I got a 730 on Math even though I only missed 3 questions, go figure).
Haha- i'm more geniouser than you. i get me a 1490 (800 math, 690 verbal) . . . oh- me ingrish not as good as me math.
I don't know about that but schools prefer scores closer together (like mine are) to a slightly higher score with greater disparity. Either way, we both did quite well.Originally posted by: Hector13
Originally posted by: boLbim33
Originally posted by: zippy
No, you're not a genius.
Anyway, I took the SATs in May of 2002 - got a 1480 (750 verbal, 730 math - I got a 730 on Math even though I only missed 3 questions, go figure).
Haha- i'm more geniouser than you. i get me a 1490 (800 math, 690 verbal) . . . oh- me ingrish not as good as me math.
actually, you are probably worse off. Don't most schools weigh the verbal more than the math? I think the PSATs do the same (at least they used to for national merit scholarship consideration). I think verbal was worth twice as much as math.
Originally posted by: CaptainKahuna
I got a 1580 on the SAT I when I took it in Nov.
Took the SAT IIs in May, just got scores today (out of 800):
Math IIC: 750
Physics: 740
That's a true story. The SAT median resetting supposedly happened in 1996. Here's a conversion chart for any of you who took the exam before that year. I have a 1550 by post-1996 standards.Originally posted by: everman
SAT has become easier over the years. Over inflated scores these days compared to many years ago. (you actually need to add 100 pts past a certain date when compared)