Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
1. Would the GPU client be over "peak" (735W) or closer to "load" (675W)?
2. I suspected 750 watts wouldn't be enough.
3. Awesome ppd!
4. Good ppd depending on who much they draw from the wall? Would the 9800GX2 draw about the same?
If WUs get bigger/tougher I suppose the newer tech would do better?
I guess I could look at it as another electric space heater (I already run two for about 2000W) in the winter, and cut back on the number of clients for the two months we don't need heat or only run during the cool of the night.
1. F@H is easier on GPUs than games & benchmarks tend to be (my cards run way cooler folding than during heavy gaming session or furmark stability testing or stuff). So "load" would be close to accurate but you might see "peak" usage during startup or something.
2. Which is why I recommended a safety margin. 850W FTW!!
3. Indeed. Probable range 20-24k ppd depending on how much is lost to "overhead."
4. Hard to find this data. Not apples-to-apples but fairly close. On a QX9770 platform the 9800GX2 solo sucks up 290W and two in SLI drain 460W. So lower power consumption but also lower ppd.
5. Yes, as WUs get more intense the newer cores with additional shaders will do a better job.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.