- Oct 22, 2000
- 24,512
- 22
- 81
I've been messing with the online game "Nation-States" for a while and I'm starting to notice a rather severe leftist bias. For example, one of my recent issues was a protest against animal cruelty and there were three choices: do nothing, ban meat-eating, or outlaw the really terrible animal abuses only. I chose the rational approach and decided to outlaw only the really terrible abuses, and now the dossier for my country says that "meat-eating is frowned upon". Where the hell do you get that from banning extreme animal cruelty?
The book on which the site is based makes the dubious claim to be a new "Catch-22", but the choices provided for the resolvement of issues certainly does leave people in a Catch-22. Had an issue today dealing with the over-population of a certain animal. I know that if I approve "limited hunting for population control" that all of a sudden the animals will be in danger, but if I choose to protect the animals there's going to be a bunch of BS akin to the whole meat-eating fiasco.
OK, that's all. I'm just minorly frustrated. Nothing more to see here, move along.
ZV
The book on which the site is based makes the dubious claim to be a new "Catch-22", but the choices provided for the resolvement of issues certainly does leave people in a Catch-22. Had an issue today dealing with the over-population of a certain animal. I know that if I approve "limited hunting for population control" that all of a sudden the animals will be in danger, but if I choose to protect the animals there's going to be a bunch of BS akin to the whole meat-eating fiasco.
OK, that's all. I'm just minorly frustrated. Nothing more to see here, move along.
ZV
Last edited by a moderator: