MustangSVT
Lifer
who are they funded by?
could this be some reverse psychology?
but yes, they are annoying.
could this be some reverse psychology?
but yes, they are annoying.
Originally posted by: rbloedow
I don't mind them. I like them from a creative and marketing standpoint.
Originally posted by: fumbduck
i still smoke
LOL! 😀Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They're too humorless and solemn to be entertaining. They lack the hysterical overstatement of the recent anti-weed ads:
- buy weed and columbian cartels will kill little children
- buy weed and terrorists will get the last $10 they need to blow up the Statue of Liberty
- smoke weed and you'll shoot your best "bud" in the basement
now that's comedy gold, no stems or seeds!
<-- doesn't smoke either kind
Originally posted by: draggoon01
i think they are annoying and somewhat misleading. the logic in some of them, well just aren't logical. a lot of the arguments they make in the commercials based off of 1 small bit of info, could be made in parallel fashion against anything else, such as US government.
the one thing i do think is interesting is that they do those type of commercials, knowing full well that it wouldn't be appropriate to for tobacco companies to retaliate with advertising addressing the truth commercials.
Originally posted by: r6ashih
who pays for it? i hope its not the tax dollars. I think it might be money from the settlements.. if so it is a waste! money should go to schools and not these dumb commercials.
Originally posted by: draggoon01
see like i just saw commercial where guy puts flowers by make-shift roadside grave. then narrator says 1in3 drivers in accidents were positive for marijuana. what???? 9 out of 10 drivers in accidents were probably right handed...
I like them fine. I like them much better than I like chimps on message boards who think they are clever or rebellious by saying these commercials make them want to smoke.