Nah, it is just an example of emotional clouding.
He was only an innovator on the corporate level. Just about everything else he did could have come by, in time, under another name. AAMOF, many of the things that people attribute to him actually came from some of the people under him. This does not define "innovator".
Does that mean he was useless? No. But he was a profit minded cheap ass dick about a lot of things and to a lot of people. THAT is what made Apple money. That and the fact that this man who testified that he was "infertile" to avoid child support payments wore a turtle neck to feel more "friendly" to the general public lets you know what he was good at.
Presentation and PR more than just about anything else. He sold tech to the technophobe.
But the one thing that most fanbois need to come to terms with is that he did NOT break down any walls to introduce a whole new world. He did not come up with electronic transmission of data or voice. He did not do the transistor or any real component part of the machine. He did not invent the mouse.
But somehow saying this, and saying that he cannot be compared to Edison gets so many people in an uproar that they wet their pants and twitter it on their iPhones.
Enough already.
The guys dead and you are giving him more love than that other guy that got 5 minutes of world press after dying of pancreatic cancer (same as Steve!) 2 weeks before he got the Nobel Prize.
Man we are so disoriented in our appellations of worth and idolization.