Anyone else creeped out by eating meat with bones in it?

[ponyo]

It's cut too thick anyway. Just cube it, marinate it, and pan fry it. Carne asada FTW!

Too thick? That's like perfect thickness.

 

[BoomerD]

Too thick? That's like perfect thickness.

Steak should always be AT LEAST 1" thick...

 

[IronWing]

Steak should always be AT LEAST 1" thick...

Nah, that’s how you end up with a raw center.

 

[snoopy7548]

Too thick? That's like perfect thickness.

That's what she said!

 

[IronWing]

Too thick? That's like perfect thickness.

That's what she said!

Nah, that’s how you end up with a raw center.

 

[PlanetJosh]

Why in Hell would most people even bother to correct and pummeled you for this in the first place? Come to think it, the vast majority of folks will agree with you about this. Including me with steaks at least.

I can be a drama queen, I mean king.

 

[blackangst1]

A little maybe and maybe I'm a coarse person for not being more bothered by it. But meat on bones at least in chicken generally retains more moisture and so tastes better. Or a better way to put it is it's not dry tasting as some boneless servings of chicken.

If I'm wrong about the moist/dry comments I'm sure I'll be severely corrected and pummeled for it.

Well, in the case of chicken, the common parts we eat with bones (legs, thighs) are dark meat which is higher in fat. Breast meat, white meat, has little fat. Thats the juiciness youre referring to.