- Apr 7, 2003
- 2,021
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: PaperclipGod
I was pretty suprised when i actually saw an anti-peta ad on tv tonight. Went to their website, and promptly gave them money. They're for personal responsibility and such things as genetically modified food, and against organizations like peta and greenpeace.
What a breath of fresh air.
Originally posted by: jester79
What channel did you see the ad on?
I used to have a manager that was an ardent member of PETA (oddly enough, her Lexus SUV had leather), and would leave the magazines around the office for everyone to read.
I read one once, and couldn't believe an article that said that if you had any kind of meat craving one or more times per month, you were addicted to meat. I guess I'm addicted to meat then (and enjoying it!)
Originally posted by: SuperTool
What a sucker.
Not a fan of PETA myself, but it doesn't mean I am going to donate money to a corporate lobbyist website.
the genetically modified food is an advancement enviromentalists shouldn't oppose, since it improves efficiency, thereby allowing more ppl to be fed with less land being used up. although it was weird when that modified corn killed several hundred thousand monarch butterflies and they couldn't figure out why
Originally posted by: SuperTool
What a sucker.
Not a fan of PETA myself, but it doesn't mean I am going to donate money to a corporate lobbyist website.
Originally posted by: Fencer128
GM food is an advancement neither side should claim to have all the facts on (their simply has not been enough real research on the issue). One thing is for sure - GM crops cut down on the spectrum of pesticides used, but not necessarily on the total amount of pesticides used. For instance, you may only need one particularly virulant pesticide on a GM crop, whereas a few different ones would be used on the non-GM variety. However, the amount of that pesticide that is sprayed is considerable, sometimes more than the combined size of the spectrum of pesticides used on the non-GM variety. Furthermore the company that manufactures the GM crop often also manufacture the pesticide... Some of these GM pesticides are not nice and you really do want to make sure this stuff doesn't get into the water supply or your body. The recent study in Britain found that wildlife within the GM field was severely impaired (all wildlife) as opposed to the non-GM field. This wasn't due to the crop itself but only the pesticide that killed everything that couldn't fly or run away quick enough. Jury's out for me. Cheers, Andythe genetically modified food is an advancement enviromentalists shouldn't oppose, since it improves efficiency, thereby allowing more ppl to be fed with less land being used up. although it was weird when that modified corn killed several hundred thousand monarch butterflies and they couldn't figure out why
Originally posted by: Hafen
I don't think they'll need your money, I'm sure Monsanto, Conagra, ADM, big Pharma, the Beef council (and other meat advocates) and other interested (and presumably sponsoring) parties ensure plenty of money goes to this "organisation." Super-slick website, loads of content, and expensive TV ads? All that money is coming from somewhere...
No fan of PETA, but I'm not fooled by these people either.
Originally posted by: PaperclipGod
Originally posted by: Hafen
I don't think they'll need your money, I'm sure Monsanto, Conagra, ADM, big Pharma, the Beef council (and other meat advocates) and other interested (and presumably sponsoring) parties ensure plenty of money goes to this "organisation." Super-slick website, loads of content, and expensive TV ads? All that money is coming from somewhere...
No fan of PETA, but I'm not fooled by these people either.
I dont doubt it. Keep up the flow of money, Monsanto, youre doing good work.![]()
