• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

anying BOINCing with a MAC?

Fullmetal Chocobo

Moderator<br>Distributed Computing
Moderator
Friend is trying to get BOINC running so that we can compare out machiens, but he can't get it working. Just wondering if anyone has actually gotten it working...

EDIT: "its not that it isn't working, its that the project site you sent me to doesn't have a package that can be sent to me" -- The Mac-er

EDIT2: "the server responds with "unknown type (POWERPC/UNIX)". It seems just problems with SIMAP... I'm trying to use SIMAP to benchmark our machines...

Anyone have any ideas?
 
Sorry for being late to this party ... 🙂

I have three Macs running BOINC: a Mini, PowerMac G4 and PowerMac G5. BOINC runs perfectly well with several clients tried: v5.2.13, v4.4.5, I have tried on all comps the "full versions" and the minimal versions.

It is the projects which are probs: not all have Mac-clients. I am running predictor@home (want to help with some protein folding), Einstein@Home, Seti@Home. All these run perfectly well and stable.

For the Seti@home client I run a optimized application, which uses all the altivec optimizations there are and a seti-WU is crunched in 38% of the time compared to the standard client. This is a real speed up - since the application uses all the math-functions built into the processor and the compilers ... There is no optimized client for the Mac (well there is one, but I (personally) do not trust it - it crashed all my Macs), but you still get some quite decent credits ...

Rosetta works quite well too, but the ooomph is not there: somehow it kind of "took for ever" to crunch'em: on a PC A64 3000+ a WU took some 3 hours; the same WU could take 10 hours to crunch on the PowerMac G5 (2.0 MHz); OK, it crunched 2 WUs at a time, but still - I got very much more fun from Seti@home.

I have tried some other projects on the PowerMac G4 - but not under OS X but under Linux. That ran good, but slow.

I would propose that a Mac-system with a G4 or G5 processor, using OS X 1.3.x or 1.4.x is best utilized when usin BIONC 5.2.1x, with seti@home, with the altivec-enabled application.

BTW, I found my thread about the Mac-Seti-application!

I hope this helps ... if not please feel free to post. I am very busy this week, but I'll try to check in now and then ...
 
Back
Top