• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

anybody use shell rotella T6?

I run it in my wrx, car seems happy with it and no complaints. Although I always have to buy one big and small for the Subaru since the big is just 3.75 liters.
 
If your motor oil is causing cat issues you have bigger problems to be worried about...like why you're getting oil in it. 😛
 
If your motor oil is causing cat issues you have bigger problems to be worried about...like why you're getting oil in it. 😛

Well, the reason I ask is because I'm getting conflicting views. My friend emailed shell and they did not recommend it for use on gas engines with cats. Yet I am reading many people are using it from what I've read through google searches.
 
Why do they only have 5w40? Just curious as my cars both "require" 5w30, and it seems most other brands offer just about every different weight/thickness, whereas this stuff seems to just be one type.
 
Well, the reason I ask is because I'm getting conflicting views. My friend emailed shell and they did not recommend it for use on gas engines with cats. Yet I am reading many people are using it from what I've read through google searches.

Interesting...no issues here (that I'm aware of anyway).
 
I run it in my saab, I think I use 5w-40, I've used it in my integra also byut probably won't next time, going to go with 10w-30 of something else. I've only thrown cat codes when running lower than recommended octane.
 
I believe the issues with cats are because of the ZDDP additive. ZDDP is supposed to be good for the lifters on some pushrod engines. Maybe it's good for other engines too.


Edit: http://www.bgprod.com/blendr/ZDDP.html

Less ZDDP = More engine wear?
The reduction of ZDDP in motor oils has caused many issues in flat tappet engines and a big stir in the classic car forum. Most V-8 engines in the muscle car era (cars built before 1975) came standard with a flat tappet camshaft and no catalytic converter. The flat tappet is, for the most part, flat on the bottom. Flat tappet cams are under a lot of pressure and require an extra oil additive for tight tolerances. Oil is the only thing between the lifter and camshaft lobe preventing them from welding each other together. Without sufficient lubrication during break-in and over long-term use, cams can suffer pitting, uneven lobes and severe wear patterns. So, in high performance or classic cars, opt for heavy-duty, performance or racing oils with higher levels of ZDDP that will provide flat tappet cams with anti-scuffing, anti-wear and oxidation inhibition.

Ok, so what about your basic passenger car? In the last decade or so, car manufacturers switched to more reliable, efficient roller camshafts for mass production. Because roller cams don’t require the same level of zinc protection as flat tappet cams, passenger car engines can afford a decrease in ZDDP. In fact, less ZDDP could actually be a good thing. Phosphorous—one of the main ingredients—is a poison to catalytic converters (fitted in most passenger cars since the mid-70s). Excessive ZDDP content will bond to the metal catalyst beads inside the converter rendering it useless as a pollution control device. See why the EPA wants to regulate the life requirement of the catalyst?

In order to meet API SM specifications, oil manufacturers must decrease ZDDP. Today’s modern passenger car oils contain other dedicated antioxidants to make up for the loss of ZDDP and resulting in a better overall product for consumers.

To sum up, less ZDDP is suitable for vehicles with roller cams and catalytic converters and bad for vehicles with flat tappet cams and no cat.
 
Back
Top