Anybody saw that Signs movie feat. Mel Gibson??

LOLyourFace

Banned
Jun 1, 2002
4,543
0
0
First I thought it was really lame because I know that those Crop fields are fake in real life (hoax made by a team of guys)

But I keep hearing good things about it.. well?
 

SWirth86

Golden Member
Aug 31, 2001
1,939
0
0
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
First I thought it was really lame because I know that those Crop fields are fake in real life (hoax made by a team of guys)

But I keep hearing good things about it.. well?
Did you see the movie? I'm guessing not....

It's not really about Aliens...there's a 'deeper meaning' (that isn't deep, and very blatant) to it that, IMO, is really stupid.
 

shurato

Platinum Member
Sep 24, 2000
2,398
0
76
Yes I saw it and I almost fell asleep literally. it could of probably been better without the stupid message and just stuck with the sci-fi aspects.
 

joe678

Platinum Member
Jun 12, 2001
2,407
0
71
just saw signs today...man that thing was lame...the scene w/the alien at the end was pathetic...i want my 5 bucks and 1.5 hours back...:|
 

fatbaby

Banned
May 7, 2001
6,427
1
0
perhaps the most in-depth review of "signs" yet

This movie wouldn't have been so bad if it actually went somewhere. It was like a porno with no money shot. One of those slow motion soft-core Showtime specials that start out as being mediocre detective melodrama, but you keep watching any way because it's starring Shannon Tweed and you know there's going to be a shower scene but you know it's going to suck because some dude inevitably comes in and starts man handling her and the camera man does nothing but zoom up on his ass. That's exactly what "Signs" is like: the camera man zooming up on some guy's ass for two hours.
 

joe678

Platinum Member
Jun 12, 2001
2,407
0
71
Originally posted by: fatbaby
perhaps the most in-depth review of "signs" yet

This movie wouldn't have been so bad if it actually went somewhere. It was like a porno with no money shot. One of those slow motion soft-core Showtime specials that start out as being mediocre detective melodrama, but you keep watching any way because it's starring Shannon Tweed and you know there's going to be a shower scene but you know it's going to suck because some dude inevitably comes in and starts man handling her and the camera man does nothing but zoom up on his ass. That's exactly what "Signs" is like: the camera man zooming up on some guy's ass for two hours.

lol...thats a freakin perfect description...;)
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Originally posted by: fatbaby
perhaps the most in-depth review of "signs" yet

This movie wouldn't have been so bad if it actually went somewhere. It was like a porno with no money shot. One of those slow motion soft-core Showtime specials that start out as being mediocre detective melodrama, but you keep watching any way because it's starring Shannon Tweed and you know there's going to be a shower scene but you know it's going to suck because some dude inevitably comes in and starts man handling her and the camera man does nothing but zoom up on his ass. That's exactly what "Signs" is like: the camera man zooming up on some guy's ass for two hours.


Thats great!

 

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
Originally posted by: fatbaby
perhaps the most in-depth review of "signs" yet

This movie wouldn't have been so bad if it actually went somewhere. It was like a porno with no money shot. One of those slow motion soft-core Showtime specials that start out as being mediocre detective melodrama, but you keep watching any way because it's starring Shannon Tweed and you know there's going to be a shower scene but you know it's going to suck because some dude inevitably comes in and starts man handling her and the camera man does nothing but zoom up on his ass. That's exactly what "Signs" is like: the camera man zooming up on some guy's ass for two hours.

ROTFLMAO! :D:D:D