Originally posted by: BenSkywalker
When you doubted the 54% earlier, you implied that it was lower.
I think most reasonable people would assume it is lower. As far as their being serious issues with trusting the GI poll, there is absolutely nothing to indicate the poll is accurate in any way whatsoever. They failed to use random sampling, the poll was voluntary and focused on the negative. The odds of getting someone that had a 360 die to fill out a poll about reliability is much higher then not. This is standard knowledge when trying to gauge these things.
Is it possible that the GI poll ended up with accurate numbers? Yes, just as you can randomly pull a Presedential approval rating out of your rectum every day when you get up and you are bound to be right at some point. Is it likely? I don't think so, but I don't have anyting to back that up outside of anecdotal evidence.