<< I don't think the next attack will be via a plane, I'm sure it will be different. >>
I agree ... And that's what worries me. NYC has gone back to how it was. Anybody can cross a bridge or pass through a tunnel without any inquiry.
Anybody could bring ANYTHING into the city ... be it a bomb, or a chemical agent to be used for attack.
On top of that, apparently the government has been reluctant to share information with citizens, or even local government officials or police regarding potential threats. In October there was a plausable threat of a 10 kiloton nuclear bomb in NYC. Neither local officials, nor the police nor the FBI nor the citizens of New York City were notified. So if the government is making the choice whether to warn us of potential threats, how secure can we feel?
Some people might say, well why make so many people scared when it might be a false alarm. Let the citizens decide that for themselves.
How would they have felt if the threat had turned out to be genuine? If they had known of a threat on September 11th, would they have told us? Maybe they wouldn't have for fear that it would cause too many people to panic.
On September 11th, people didn't panic ... It was a surprisingly orderly exodus from downtown, and a warning of another potential threat would yield the same results.