I thought CRT's are better than LCD's?
Here was their reasoning:
For many power users--gamers and graphic designers, for example--the quick pixel response rate and the color accuracy of a CRT more than make up for its heft. With that in mind, we selected the NEC MultiSync FE2111SB, a 22-inch CRT with a maximum resolution of 1,920x1,440. And unlike an LCD, a CRT has no native resolution, letting you set the resolution to meet your exact specifications for playing games (say, 1,600x1,200) without sacrificing image quality. The NEC MultiSync FE2111SB also uses an aperture grille that produces a brighter image than most shadow-mask CRTs. (A shadow-mask monitor passes light through a dotted grill to produce an image on the screen, whereas an aperture grille is made up of a series of charged metal strips that run vertically down the screen.)
or is that just a buncha bs?