- Apr 5, 2004
- 4,426
- 0
- 76
Not to mention a superior input (kbm)
Don't want to start a holy war, but although kbm is definitely better for many games/genres (e.g. shooters) there are plenty of other games where it's no better than other input methods or is worse.
It really just depends on what you want to play.
Also, I won't believe that there actually are Pc gamers that don't have a gamepad.
*raises hand*
First-person shooter: I buy it for the PC or not at all
Action, Driving: I buy it for the PS3 with some exceptions
I'm not paying $40 for an Xbox 360 controller (not to mention I can't stand them) and most of the third-party controllers are crap or too expensive.
Getting back on track, T-minus 41 days until Feb 20th.
T-minus 41 days until Feb 20th.
...
Getting back on track, T-minus 41 days until Feb 20th.
I'm really hoping the HD 7890 exists after looking at the fact that the clock-for-clock difference between the HD 7950 and HD 7970 is 3-7%. Since according to the rumors the amount of compute units cut will be the same, that means 6-14% difference clock-for-clock. If it'd cost $300-330 it'd be a huge hit.
That's the beauty of Pc gaming, there is no Microsoft nor Sony nor Nintendo to tell you what you should or shouldn't do. Ps2 with an usb adapter? Sure. Wiimote with custom drivers? No prob. Joysticks, steering wheels, trackballs, horrid monstrosities like Razer's Naga, use what you want.
Also, I won't believe that there actually are Pc gamers that don't have a gamepad.
I don't own a gamepad.
I play either FPS (M+KB), WoT (M+KB) or space/flight games (Force Feedback Joystick)...or cargames(Force Feedback Joystick).
Don't need a gamepad, don't want a gamepad...games designed for gamepads often suffer from "autoaim"...and that *beep* needs to die.
Initially the HD 7770 should be $150, but I don't expect it to perform better than a $150 HD 6850 at stock speeds given what we know about its SPs, ROPs, TMUs. Figure maybe 80% the performance for the same price...not really a good deal unless it can make up the 20% via an overclock (900 to 1100 MHz)No deals this generation huh?Whats gonna be $150 the 7770?
Latest "news" are saying 7850/7870 release is March 6th:
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...07770-on-february-15-78507870-on-march-6.aspx
Actually, Tom's reported a bit more info about the 7850/7870:
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/AMD-Radeon-HD-7000-gpu-video-card,14596.html
Summary:
(1) HD7870 ($299) - 1408 stream processors and 88 texture units, 2GB Vram (and thus 256-bit bus)
(2) HD7850 ($249) - 1280 stream processors and 80 texture units, 2GB Vram (and thus 256-bit bus)
And here's some information on existing cards
(3) HD7950 ($449) - 1792 stream processors and 112 texture units, 800MHz/1250MHz clocks, 384-bit bus
(4) HD6950 (~$250) - 1408 stream processors and 88 texture units, 800MHz/1250MHz clocks, 256-bit bus
Let's extrapolate performance from the delta between the 7950 and 6950. The 7950, which has 1792 stream processors (27% more than the 6950), the same clock speed, and 50% more memory bandwidth, is approximately 32% faster than the 6950 (using Metro 2033 as a benchmark).
That means that it almost exactly lines up with its theoretical advantage, and the $299 7870 will almost certainly match but not significantly exceed the 6950 unless it's clocked much higher. For all the hoopla about GCN's advantages over VLIW, the performance of the new cards seems to come down almost entirely to compute hardware and clock speeds.