- May 19, 2011
- 20,073
- 14,505
- 136
That is, knowing when to say stop in terms of your car becoming too expensive to maintain over time?
The simple considerations AFAIK are things like "are this particular car's unusually expensive compared to others of its generation" and "if something sufficiently expensive dies compared to the probable value of the car".
In Oct 2012 I bought a Mazda 323 (built mid 2003, about 60k miles I think) based on my budget/cashflow available. £2.5k
May 2013: Service - oil, filter, front and rear brakes cleaned/adjusted. Two new front tyres, and a rear tyre was resealed as it was leaking. £288
Sept 2013: MOT (UK's mandatory yearly road worthiness test, it's fairly basic to ensure that you're not driving a death trap). No problems. ~£60
Dec 2013: Clunking sound checked, off-side (front and back) anti roll bars replaced, rear brake pipe washers leaking and replaced, rear brake pads replaced, rear break pipe banjo bolts replaced, and bleed out rear brakes. £215
I could hear the sound of dodgy bearings, so I brought the car in.
Apr 2014: Two rear wheel bearings replaced (more expensive because they include the hub) and a front wheel bearing. No stock for the brakes, so second visit required. £634
Apr 2014: Both front brake pads and discs replaced. £163
---
2013 looked like a fairly standard year for maintenance in terms of a car that gets probably 10-15k miles per year.
2014 is looking a little scary in comparison. I guess the work is fairly standard, but the price of those bearings was pretty shocking.
At this point I'm wondering whether the logic I should employ is that if the car costs more in 2015 than it does in 2014 to keep on the road, then I should think of getting rid of it (assuming something really serious doesn't occur). I don't have any car repair skills btw. I check basic things like oil, brake fluid levels, tyres, radiator fluid level, make sure the car isn't leaking, that sort of thing.
Thoughts?
The simple considerations AFAIK are things like "are this particular car's unusually expensive compared to others of its generation" and "if something sufficiently expensive dies compared to the probable value of the car".
In Oct 2012 I bought a Mazda 323 (built mid 2003, about 60k miles I think) based on my budget/cashflow available. £2.5k
May 2013: Service - oil, filter, front and rear brakes cleaned/adjusted. Two new front tyres, and a rear tyre was resealed as it was leaking. £288
Sept 2013: MOT (UK's mandatory yearly road worthiness test, it's fairly basic to ensure that you're not driving a death trap). No problems. ~£60
Dec 2013: Clunking sound checked, off-side (front and back) anti roll bars replaced, rear brake pipe washers leaking and replaced, rear brake pads replaced, rear break pipe banjo bolts replaced, and bleed out rear brakes. £215
I could hear the sound of dodgy bearings, so I brought the car in.
Apr 2014: Two rear wheel bearings replaced (more expensive because they include the hub) and a front wheel bearing. No stock for the brakes, so second visit required. £634
Apr 2014: Both front brake pads and discs replaced. £163
---
2013 looked like a fairly standard year for maintenance in terms of a car that gets probably 10-15k miles per year.
2014 is looking a little scary in comparison. I guess the work is fairly standard, but the price of those bearings was pretty shocking.
At this point I'm wondering whether the logic I should employ is that if the car costs more in 2015 than it does in 2014 to keep on the road, then I should think of getting rid of it (assuming something really serious doesn't occur). I don't have any car repair skills btw. I check basic things like oil, brake fluid levels, tyres, radiator fluid level, make sure the car isn't leaking, that sort of thing.
Thoughts?
Last edited: