Any reason to prefer XP Home to Pro for gaming?

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Does XP Home include any features / bundled software / dehydrated Hudson Leick clones / whatever that are useful for a gaming partition and which are not included in XP Pro?

I'm finally going to be upgrading to a P4 soon and will probably set up my usual "work" and "play" OS partitions (chosen with Boot Magic) and I'm wondering if there is any reason not to use Pro for "play."
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
12,874
3,647
136
Not that I'm aware. I'm not a Windows fanatic, but I thought Home was a proper subset of Pro as far as OS features are concerned.

Welcome to 2002, Dave. ;)
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Welcome to 2002, Dave. ;)
Yeah, I know :) But my P3-933 with Win2K + W98SE (games) has been working great for about 2.5 years now so I haven't had much incentive to upgrade.

I finally want enough new parts (HD space, DVD burner, better video card) that I figure I might as well upgrade to something HL2/Doom3 ready despite the annoyance of reinstalling everything from Visual Studio to Unreal Tournament.
 

dawks

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,071
2
81
No, XP has features geared toward a corporate environment, such as the ability to join a domain, remote desktop, and a few other NON-Gaming related features.

Other then that however, they are the SAME OS.
 

Canterwood

Golden Member
May 25, 2003
1,138
0
0
XP Home is just a dumbed down version of XP Pro and wont run any better.
TBH, if you've got Win2K, there's not that much incentive to upgrade to XP Pro.
Win2K will run all newer games very well.