I'm not ready yet to buy a replacement for my dearly departed D90, but am building a case for either staying with Nikon or moving to Canon.
I believe the Canon 6D is the entry level Full Frame from Canon, similar to the D600/610 from Nikon.
If you have owned or used both of these, which one did you like more, and why?
I agree that 'better images' is a subjective opinion, but I'm still interested in any personal experience comparing the two, and also if other things stood out (weight, quicker focus, etc).
I have seen used 6Ds on sale on the local Craigslist at much lower price than the D610s, which made me wonder if it was just coincidence, or there's more to it. This, despite the dismal reputation of the D600 because of the "oil spots" issue (that seems to be dogging the D610 too).
I believe the Canon 6D is the entry level Full Frame from Canon, similar to the D600/610 from Nikon.
If you have owned or used both of these, which one did you like more, and why?
I agree that 'better images' is a subjective opinion, but I'm still interested in any personal experience comparing the two, and also if other things stood out (weight, quicker focus, etc).
I have seen used 6Ds on sale on the local Craigslist at much lower price than the D610s, which made me wonder if it was just coincidence, or there's more to it. This, despite the dismal reputation of the D600 because of the "oil spots" issue (that seems to be dogging the D610 too).