1: Bad parents not taking care of their kid
2: Mining is dangerous, but criminal neglect and maleficence is something that may not lead to the CEO; given such a large company it may make a LOT of sense that the CEO did a great job while some ass-hat down below was cheating the books to make himself look better.
3: Why did they go into debt for a house that they built themselves? Maybe if she spent less than she earned and was responsible she'd have been OK. That said people who kill themselves are already broken, she could have just as well killed herself when they took golden-girls off of the rotation... Oh and her husband died, maybe THAT was the straw my friends?
4: Did the CEO sign off on the malfeasance? How does WS have anything to do with a poor financial choice on the part of the company? If anything the dangers of such problems are much more likely to keep people safe than the face-less government looking after such systems in places like Mexico.
5: "investor owned" as opposed to what? Government owned? NO, health outcomes in government facilities are horrendous.
Every one of these examples is an attempt to blame the wrong person in-order to argue for what? Hate is all I can see here, no vision for a better world, just hate and what? Directed at wall-street? Market efficient financial brokering had NOTHING to do with ANY of these; people being selfish sacks of shit did: something that wouldn't change under any other system, but may be much worse.
The real problem is what George is saying in the above: we need to deal with K street, not wall-street. We need to internalize costs, not mindlessly rail against people that help society. It's pure mindless drivel when you start looking to minimize costs for the most marginalized at the expense of the benefit of the vast majority. Your reality is so tainted by trivial emotions that you can't see the difference.
This isn't 99% vs the 1% this is the 10% somewhere in the middle that feel bad about the hardship of the bottom 1% but are happy to screw the top 99% so that 1% doesn't "suffer".
The real 99% is the top 99%; the people worth sympathy are the 1%: but they aren't worth so much sympathy that we should significantly hurt the lives of the other 99%.