- May 21, 2001
- 26,187
- 4,853
- 126
I need a quick answer - not enough time to wait to see our own lawyer (although I will later this week) - so I came here just on the off chance that someone would like to offer their opinions.
Suppose you have a machine and software for the machine. In a contract, there is terminology that says payment will be received upon completion of the "technology transfer" to a second party. The term "technology transfer" was unfortunately not clearly defined (our lawyer missed it when writing the contract). If you deliver the hardware (machine) and compiled software to run the machine (everything that is needed to use it), would you consider that a "technology transfer"? Or in your opinion is it required for the proprietary source code to be delivered as well?
I know nothing about law, but in my opinion if I purchase a computer, I expect some software to come with it, but I'd never expect the source code for Windows. This may be turn into a long legal battle...
Suppose you have a machine and software for the machine. In a contract, there is terminology that says payment will be received upon completion of the "technology transfer" to a second party. The term "technology transfer" was unfortunately not clearly defined (our lawyer missed it when writing the contract). If you deliver the hardware (machine) and compiled software to run the machine (everything that is needed to use it), would you consider that a "technology transfer"? Or in your opinion is it required for the proprietary source code to be delivered as well?
I know nothing about law, but in my opinion if I purchase a computer, I expect some software to come with it, but I'd never expect the source code for Windows. This may be turn into a long legal battle...
