Any benchmarks available for 166FSB vs 200FSB with Dual Channel DDR (In Sync w/FSB?)

zwanrock78

Junior Member
Apr 24, 2003
11
0
0
Im trying to figure out if i should spend the extra 30 bux to run my barton 2500 on a 200mhz fsb with Corsair PC3200 CL2 vs. running it at 166FSB with Corsair PC2700 CL2.

What type of gain can I expect if I kept the CPU core the same on both systems (I would llower the multiplier on the 200FSB)


Thanks!
 

Tetsuo

Lifer
Oct 20, 2002
10,908
13
81
dual channel will always provide better performance over single channel
 

pelikan

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2002
3,118
0
76
Definately worth the $30. in my opinion. Big difference in performance.
Besides, 200fsb is about to become the standard for the fastest cpus. I think the 200fsb Barton is supposed to come out in May.
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
Originally posted by: Tetsuo
dual channel will always provide better performance over single channel

not necessarily... go check anand's benchies...

it usually does but not by a HUGE margin.... that's why I'm running 1 stick instead of two...
 

zwanrock78

Junior Member
Apr 24, 2003
11
0
0
I decieded on GEIL 2x256 PC3200 Ultra CAS2 6-3-3 1T. I read several good reviews on its overclockablity and stability at 200Mhz. Plus I saved about 40 from the corsairs and got them in a paired set from newegg.com for $99 bux.