Any airline ticket comparison search engine that factors in baggage?

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
Are there any international airline comparison search engines that factor in baggage as part of their search results and displayed prices? It's pretty useless when you sort the search results by price, click on the cheapest option, go halfway through the checkout process, and learn that it's actually very expensive when you add a single checked bag, or to learn that checked bags aren't even an option (like Kiwi.com).
 
Last edited:
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
Every airline sucks and will charge you exorbitant fees for baggage except for Southwest.... and I think maybe Jet Blue. There, you have everything you need.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
If you are looking for the cheapest ticket then maybe choose the cheapest ticket and bring no bags and buy when you get there. That, or take FedEx/DHL/UPS.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Don't think one exists. Why not just compile a list of airlines who charge (or not) for 1 checked bag and then factor that in yourself after being presented with results?
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
Don't think one exists. Why not just compile a list of airlines who charge (or not) for 1 checked bag and then factor that in yourself after being presented with results?

Because it's complex bull-shittery regardless.

One has checked bags for $50 each.
One has them for $50 each, but starts overage charges at 25lbs
One has them for $50 each, but if you upgrade your seat/ticket to the "normal" from economy for $30 you get 1-checked bag free
One has free checked bag if you hold their credit card
One has free checked bag if you have status with the airline
One has free checked bags for international trips

You get the point. It's all a complex and stupid fucking game - and as politically right leaning I am with libertarian aspects, things like this need to be fucking regulated.

It shouldn't cost more than $10 to put a fucking bag in a cargo-bin. Simple things like a regulation stating that every domestic flight ticket comes with 1-checked bag up to 50lbs and each additional can only be up to $15 would go a long way.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
Think of it as an industry backlash for those folks always looking to bottom of the barrel ticket fares.
 

Insomniator

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2002
6,294
171
106
Because it's complex bull-shittery regardless.

It shouldn't cost more than $10 to put a fucking bag in a cargo-bin. Simple things like a regulation stating that every domestic flight ticket comes with 1-checked bag up to 50lbs and each additional can only be up to $15 would go a long way.

If it were cheaper people would pack their entire ****ing life for every weekend day trip. And can airlines start enforcing the overhead bag size rule? How many retards do I have to watch try to cram over-sized bags into the bins?

Pay the 25/50 bucks and check it or bring less stuff.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,557
3,728
126
You get the point. It's all a complex and stupid fucking game

How is a 2 second google search to get baggage fee information complex? Whatever you do please don't fly on any intra Europe or intra Asia tickets then as you'll probably be hopelessly lost because they often have even more disparate allowances by airline, notably smaller allowable luggage dimensions and actually hold you to size and weight restrictions. (Sure ULCCs do that here but I've had carry on stuff weighed by BA, Lufthansa and Iberia off the top of my head. I've never had my carry on weighed by Delta, United, AA, Alaska etc)

Unfortunately you can usually tell who are Americans at overseas airports as they're the ones lugging around bloated luggage stuffed to the gills and then get all upset when its sized and weighed because it 'was fine in America' but now they have to pay more

But maybe a 2 second google search is too complex for most Americans...

and as politically right leaning I am with libertarian aspects, things like this need to be fucking regulated.

It shouldn't cost more than $10 to put a fucking bag in a cargo-bin. Simple things like a regulation stating that every domestic flight ticket comes with 1-checked bag up to 50lbs and each additional can only be up to $15 would go a long way.

It would go a long way towards raising airfares. Why should I have to pay more for my carry on only trip just because you need to cart a crap ton of stuff on yours? That doesn't sound libertarian at all.

Think of it as an industry backlash for those folks always looking to bottom of the barrel ticket fares.

This. People proved that Spirit's 'pay for everything and offer shitty service' model was successful so everyone else started doing it.
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
If it were cheaper people would pack their entire ****ing life for every weekend day trip. And can airlines start enforcing the overhead bag size rule? How many retards do I have to watch try to cram over-sized bags into the bins?

Pay the 25/50 bucks and check it or bring less stuff.

As someone that often has to travel for work - (and I normally only need one carry-on luggage), I would wager that majority of folks travel a typical of 3-5 days business wise, and anywhere from 1 - 3 weeks vacation wise. Being able for each passenger to have ONE check-in luggage at the cost of the ticket isn't asking for jack shit. Well, you know... considering that EVERY airline allowed such once upon a time. Remind me, how much did fares go down when they revoked that and started charging fees for it? Oh yeah, nothing. Fucking nothing. The fares didn't change, and the airlines now enjoy a fat profit on the "courtesy" of you having to use clothing at your destination.

How is a 2 second google search to get baggage fee information complex? Whatever you do please don't fly on any intra Europe or intra Asia tickets then as you'll probably be hopelessly lost because they often have even more disparate allowances by airline, notably smaller allowable luggage dimensions and actually hold you to size and weight restrictions. (Sure ULCCs do that here but I've had carry on stuff weighed by BA, Lufthansa and Iberia off the top of my head. I've never had my carry on weighed by Delta, United, AA, Alaska etc)

Unfortunately you can usually tell who are Americans at overseas airports as they're the ones lugging around bloated luggage stuffed to the gills and then get all upset when its sized and weighed because it 'was fine in America' but now they have to pay more

But maybe a 2 second google search is too complex for most Americans...

It's not complex if you know what airline you are flying. I'm answering to the OP - whom is looking for a search engine that factors in all the different elements from all the different airlines - and that isn't easy is my point. No need to get snarky like I don't know how to find the baggage policy from a particular airline.

As a matter of fact, Lufthansa is an airline I'll be flying shortly. I have a trip to Germany, and will be spending 2-weeks in Germany followed by 1 week in Belgium. Lufthansa is what I'm using to fly from Munich to Brussels - but obviously being gone for 3 weeks we're going to need some checked luggage - especially because we're traveling with a kiddo. This is actually an example I was stating where if you buy their "economy" seat you don't get a checked bag, but if I upgrade to the "normal" seat, I do. Unsurprisingly I didn't have any other options for direct flights.


It would go a long way towards raising airfares. Why should I have to pay more for my carry on only trip just because you need to cart a crap ton of stuff on yours? That doesn't sound libertarian at all.

Once again, I say b-b-b-b-ullshit. Once upon a time, they spelled out this bullshit rhetoric that "If we start charging for bags it will bring down the fares". BULL-FUCKING-SHIT. You and I both know it's bullshit, hopefully you're not stupid and can remove your head from your ass and admit that it is bullshit.

I'm not saying that we should be able to carry on a Cargo-ship of luggage. I said ONE checked-bag. ONE.

Also on that note, since you want to throw everyone under the bus that has ever had to check a bag (obviously you don't have a family or you would understand) - why aren't we charging fat fucks more? They take up more space, they piss off people that have to sit next to them, and their weight plays a much larger factor in the mileage of the plane. A 350lb person could be swapped with a 200lb passenger and 3 checked bags.


This. People proved that Spirit's 'pay for everything and offer shitty service' model was successful so everyone else started doing it.

I think spirit airline is more of an example of a pyramid scheme... Once you have try it once you will never again return (for majority of customers). I partly blame the stupid sites like Travelocity/Hotwire/<Insert "discount" travel site>. People book their fares there and just presume that it is all the same with the final price and don't learn their lesson until they hit all the fees on their trip.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,557
3,728
126
As someone that often has to travel for work - (and I normally only need one carry-on luggage), I would wager that majority of folks travel a typical of 3-5 days business wise, and anywhere from 1 - 3 weeks vacation wise. Being able for each passenger to have ONE check-in luggage at the cost of the ticket isn't asking for jack shit. Well, you know... considering that EVERY airline allowed such once upon a time.

They also didn't used to charge change fees, had better food, more room, better rewards programs etc.

But then they also cost significantly more. Airfare is down 42% since 1979 and 17% from 2000

Remind me, how much did fares go down when they revoked that and started charging fees for it? Oh yeah, nothing. Fucking nothing. The fares didn't change, and the airlines now enjoy a fat profit on the "courtesy" of you having to use clothing at your destination.

Thats just flat out wrong. See below.

It's not complex if you know what airline you are flying. I'm answering to the OP - whom is looking for a search engine that factors in all the different elements from all the different airlines - and that isn't easy is my point. No need to get snarky like I don't know how to find the baggage policy from a particular airline.

Its still not complex when you don't know what airline you want to fly. Airline 1 is $50 cheaper than Airline 2. Take 2 seconds to get baggage fee from google from Airline 1. Take 2 seconds to get baggage fee from google for Airline 2. Complete simple math equation. Done. Now it may be annoying to spend 8 seconds doing this but its far from complex.

Once again, I say b-b-b-b-ullshit. Once upon a time, they spelled out this bullshit rhetoric that "If we start charging for bags it will bring down the fares". BULL-FUCKING-SHIT.

Well sure - if you want to ignore the facts. The GAO noted that airfare fees did go down - they just didn't go down enough to offset the increased cost for those checking a bag. Basically I stopped subsidizing your fares.

Its also the cheapest time to fly ever in history. Literally since 2017 is on track to be cheaper than any other recorded year.

I'm not saying that we should be able to carry on a Cargo-ship of luggage. I said ONE checked-bag. ONE.

I don't care if its 1 or 35. I don't want to subsidize your travel habits because you need a checked bag. When I can fly from Chicago to Florida on AA for $52 or to Vegas for $80 there is near zero chance prices will remain that low if they start letting people check a bag for free.

Also on that note, since you want to throw everyone under the bus that has ever had to check a bag (obviously you don't have a family or you would understand)

Unfortunately for your flawed assumption I do have a family. I also check bags on occasion (although I always try to avoid it) but I never thought to complain about the tiny amount of time I spent looking up Jetstar's baggage policy in Australia so I could compare the different to Virgin Australia which did include a checked bag.

why aren't we charging fat fucks more? They take up more space, they piss off people that have to sit next to them, and their weight plays a much larger factor in the mileage of the plane. A 350lb person could be swapped with a 200lb passenger and 3 checked bags.

Uh...we do. Passengers of a certain size are required to buy a second seat. Besides - its not only about weight. Its a trade off between increased boarding time\staff time and fuel\ getting part of the fare out from under the 7.5% federal taxes levied on airfare sales by the government. Lower fares by moving charges to ancillary fees which are not taxed and you have a notable tax savings. For United that was about $700M in baggage fees they didn't pay 7.5% on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadlyapp
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
Exterous I just can't wait to see the day when all the other airlines pull a Spirit Airlines - and your days of comfortably traveling for free with a carry-on luggage come to a crashing halt and you get incredibly butt-hurt that you can't bring your carry-on for free.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,913
4,506
126
I just refuse to check a bag. Pretty simple and long as you can keep your liquids and clothing under control. Re-wear things, it is okay. Or pay the $3 to have your clothes laundered by the hotel while you are out sightseeing. The cost varies by destination of course, and expensive cities will be far higher, but $3 total for a full suitcase is the average from all the countries that I visit. It is odd having your underwear pressed to paper thin and folded neatly, but you learn to deal with it.

On the flip side, a great way to get stopped and checked/frisked repeatedly when travelling internationally is to have a 2 week international vacation with your wife and only a single carry-on bag and a small backpack. The passports also got a red sticker on the back with the agent's initials and we never had a red sticker before (usually green or blue). So, maybe the red is their flag that they think we are lying.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,544
6,368
126
If an extra $25 each way is going to make or break your trip, you probably can't afford to be flying and traveling in the first place.