Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: ericlp
I think we need more engineers that can build better robots.... I really think in this day in age, we should have the best robot technology to build 90% of a car to 100% accurate standards. Yeah, that would possibly even lower the work force number, at the same time you have to hire a pretty big IT force to keep the robots working. Robots don't complain or take sick days or require over time pay, raises, health insurance ...etc...etc... But if we want to 'compete' with over seas ... This is the only option I see... If we don't start to figure this out now before China starts selling it's cars under 6-7K in the USA I believe that the US automaker will continue to lose profits and lay off more people.
But the UAW and union fluffers don't like automation - it takes unskilled labor and turns it into professional positions(engineering staff) which don't fall under the union. I've been in plants where I get the evil eye from the union fluffers as I'm an automation engineer brought in from the outside to make lines run better/faster/with less manpower. They see the writing on the wall and don't like it.
I sleep well at night knowing that by me doing what I do - I help keep the factory HERE in the US instead of them sending over the border. Plus it isn't always about manpower reduction - many times it's about safety and product changes.
Sure, but that's not real helpful to some 45 year old line worker who doesn't have the benefit of professional training as an automation engineer. I agree that holding back automation just for the sake of preserving jobs is silly, but I also think we could do a better job making sure the transition doesn't put anyone out of work for the rest of their lives. Job retraining is something that I think everyone could get behind. You can sleep well at night helping the industry as a whole, but you can also sleep well at night knowing that this march towards the future isn't going to leave a whole lot of people behind.