To be fair, cyclists might use current road infrastructure but they damn sure don't add any significant wear and tear like cars do.
Sure, but many cyclists around my area *demand* addition of bike lanes. I'm for it, but I'm also for them helping to pay for the addition of these lanes where possible.
Question: When there is a wide open sidewalk why the hell do some cyclists insist on riding on the side of the road a few short feet from my mirror as I pass them at 5 times their speed?
Do you really want a cyclist doing 20MPH or more right next to pedestrians? This is the reason I originally came in here saying I support a requirement that all bikes to be used on a main road (all roads in WA are called "highways" actually...) must have tabs and a license plate. Riding without tabs would constitute a moving violation and they would need to have their bikes moved home for them. I'd support an exemption for kids under 16 or something. Bikes *DO NOT* belong on sidewalks - unless the rider has dismounted and is walking the bike along. They also DO NOT belong on roads where the limit is 45-50MPH and there is no bike lane.
Use the costs obtained from the cost of the tabs to pay for adding bike lanes on roads - lanes that a cyclist is forced to use when present.