• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

anthrax...crazy dude or terrorists?

Crazy dude.

I think that it would be somewhere a bit more important if it were terrorists. And in a bit more volume too
 
The crazy head of the terrorists.
No, not OBL, Saddam Hussein.
Like I posted earlier about him, "YOUR NEXT FVCKER!"
 
well, it is a crazy dude no matter what.

and a terrorist no matter what.

the question is, is it an american citizen like the unibomber who is gasping for attention or is it an arab foreigner linked to bin laden

edit- btw, I'm almost certain it is not linked to bin laden, but instead is a unabomber kind of freak. only hitting media outlets, etc. if it was an arab terrorist they would just spray the sh!t over a big city in a crop duster to kill as many people as possible instead of targeting specific media outlets
 
Technically, "crazy dude" and "terrorists" are one and the same:

ter·ror·ism (tr-rzm) n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

A "crazy dude" would be no less guilty of terrorist acts than "terrorists".

Despite that non-distinction, that I know what you meant. You should probably clarify the two into "Isolated Incident" and "Part of Jihad against U.S."

At this point I'm inclined to believe that they are isolated incidents. But, with more and more occurences, it's looking less and less isolated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top