Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
Oh really?I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
Ah yes... It's completely unreasonable to use a P4 for any other reason.Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
Tell me more, what video card should I get now??????
Duh! XGI Volari is the only reasonable choice .
Originally posted by: xSkyDrAx
Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: Reliant
Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tell me more, what video card should I get now??????
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duh! XGI Volari is the only reasonable choice .
Forget that! Onboard stuff!
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Ah yes... It's completely unreasonable to use a P4 for any other reason.Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The four emoticons? Nah, that was my way of rating how lame the post was.Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Ah yes... It's completely unreasonable to use a P4 for any other reason.Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Itchy trigger finger?
Originally posted by: Wingznut
The four emoticons? Nah, that was my way of rating how lame the post was.Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Ah yes... It's completely unreasonable to use a P4 for any other reason.Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Itchy trigger finger?
I give it a four.... out of five.
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion, but when I look at Anand's review of the P4-3.2ghz (see Jeff7181's link above), I see the P4 win every gaming benchmark... Quite handily, actually.Originally posted by: dguy6789
it is not a debate, the Athlon XP is better in most games... But in general the athlon xp is better in about 70% of all games out there...
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
In before the lock:clock:
Originally posted by: slaves123
I will answer you my friend, an AMD Athlon XP it's much better for gaming, the P4 is only reasonable for data bases, although it more expensive.