Just as an aside . . . . I keep learning "new stuff."
I got two NeoPower 480's -- one I purchased for my server upstairs, and the other for my bro's Xmas-present-upgrade.
My "MOJO" project -- originally begun with Northwood processors -- found me discarding an ALLIED 510 watt PSU because it couldn't hold the voltage on the 12V rail with only moderate over-clocking. I replaced it wth an OCZ PowerStream 520. Very happy with that.
Now the Powerstream came to me slightly out of adjustment, and the errors in adjustment seemed to be precisely those which had been reported by Maximum PC Magazine in a review of PSU's last year. However, this could not be much of a problem -- the reason I bought the Powerstream in the first place was because the rails are adjustable using pot-screws available on the case exterior. I tweaked them all slightly, and everything was fine -- with my voltages within 1% deviation from the specs. (Supposedly, these sorts of deviations are acceptable within a +/- 2% range.)
I decided to switch from Northwood to Prescott -- causing some chagrin among my AMD-advocate friends, who thought I'd be better off moving up to an SLI-ready AMD mobo and processor. But the Prescott was always "in the cards." MOJO was an "exercise" in air-cooling.
When I made the switch, I had everything in a temporary ATX midtower case fitted with one of the Neopower PSUs. And suddenly, I see that the voltages were "different." Not "out of spec," but different. Obviously, I would think that this was a difference of the PSUs -- but not so.
When I relocated everything to the original full-tower case with the PowerStream -- the voltage readings appeared to be identical to those taken with the NeoPower!!
The PSU? NOT!! I had also replaced the mobo with a newer version of same. It was either the processor, the mobo, or both -- not the PSUs.
So far, for the purposes I chose for deployment of the Neopower PSUs, I'm quite happy with them. I DO believe the OCZ is a "better" PSU, but there's nothing wrong with these Neopowers.