• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Antarctic Snowfall Snafu Derails Climate Models..11 August 2006

IGBT

Lifer
Text
In the August 10 edition of Science magazine..

"The year-to-year and decadal variability of the snowfall is so large that it makes it nearly impossible to distinguish trends that might be related to climate change from even a 50-year record," said Monaghan.


An improved method of measuring Antarctic snowfall has revealed that previous records showing an increase in precipitation are not accurate, even over a half-century. In the August 10 edition of Science magazine, researchers explain that their analysis of ice cores and snow pits revealed that precipitation levels in the Antarctic have in fact remained steady. The upshot of the study is that models assessing climate-change may need to be revised, as they can no longer be deemed accurate.

The multinational Antarctic team comprised 16 researchers who wanted to amass snowfall data going back 50 years to the International Geophysical Year (IGY). The data taken from the IGY is regarded as the first real study of the Antarctic, which has been ongoing ever since. This time around, however, the team found that their data contradicted computer models used to calculate global climate change, where most predict an increase in precipitation as atmospheric temperatures increase. "There were no statistically significant trends in snowfall accumulation over the past five decades, including recent years for which global mean temperatures have been warmest," said lead author Andrew Monaghan, a research associate with Ohio State University's Byrd Polar Research Center.
 
I blame George W. Bush.

If he had signed the Kyoto Treaty we wouldn't have these inaccurate computer models.
 
Originally posted by: Glavinsolo
Does this directly affect me in any way?


..it will when the global warming racketeers make ya pay more taxes and roll back your life style to fund their "hot air" paradigm.
 
Wow.. Post that snowfall has remained statistically constant and somehow a bunch of armchair scientists constrew it to mean that there is no global warming.
 
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Wow.. Post that snowfall has remained statistically constant and somehow a bunch of armchair scientists constrew it to mean that there is no global warming.

No but it shows the fallability of the computer models used by scientists and activists trying to enact major changes on our lives. The computer models are created by humans using inaccurate data. Here, they said they expected more snow in the antarctic because their global warming theories told them it would be so. Instead, it has been steady.

 
Back
Top