Originally posted by: rudder
Originally posted by: blackangst1
No suprise. As the tax laws squeeze more and more from those who pay most of it anyway, they WILL leave. And why shouldnt they? I know of one person on this board who think farewell would be the best thing.
Once universal healthcare becomes a reality (factoring in the 20 million low paid illegal workers who would be eligible through amnesty) the taxes of such companies would double. They are getting out while the getting is good.
Uh...considering Switzerland already has universal healthcare
link, and considering that per-capita America spends far more than any other industrialized country with its privatized healthcare (and presumably America's spending would fall once we get rid of the clear conflict of interests all-too evident in our current "system"), how do you come to that conclusion?
Edit: I did a bit of
research, and found that the US's total per-capita expenditure on healthcare is 6096.2, the highest, while Switzerland's is $5571.9, in the top five.
So, basically, you're alleging that Philip Morris is moving to Switzerland, a more "socialistic" country at least in terms of healthcare, to avoid the effects of the United States going
in Switzerland's direction in regards to healthcare (i.e. some form of universal healthcare to replace the current, very messed up/inefficient privatized system)?
Edit 20 (or so): I apologize to the server an anyone trying to read my post for editing it about 20 times getting this post "just right".
Edit 25 (or so): I edited the WHO link to zero on on just the comparison I was referring to.