He hadn't actually been awarded anything yet, the $200k was a loan. But his claim was for millions.
Okay, thanks. That is much better.
And his son via the estate gets to continue with the lawsuit for wrongful imprisonment, with any applicable awarded damages minus costs going to him.
Once again citizens get to pay for government mistakes, and rarely are those responsible for the costly mistakes held accountable.
One of several reasons why LEO's should have to carry the equivalent of malpractice insurance.
None of this negates the fact he deserved one hell of a settlement and I hope his son collects and uses it wisely. If it was me I'd begin with a nice donation to the innocence project, which has used DNA technology to prove and release hundreds of convicted prisoners.
Of course citizens pay for government mistakes; government is (presumably anyway) working on our behalf. But you have a good point. Every time an innocent person is freed, there should be an independent and thorough investigation as to how that happened. I'm not saying that happened here, but it isn't terribly unusual to find that prosecutors or cops have "forgotten" to include exculpatory or mitigating testimony or evidence at discovery, or have done things like delaying everything and then dumping it all at once late in the game, complete with multiple copies to increase the size of the pile. Overt dishonesty is rare, but that too happens, and rare is cold comfort to the man who spends seventeen years falsely imprisoned. If it's truly just honest mistakes, fine. If the system broke down, identify that particular problem and fix it. If it's incompetence of malfeasance, identify that and take the appropriate action. Otherwise we will have more innocents imprisoned and corrupt officials who should be imprisoned remaining free.
Let's assume it was a Drug Deal gone bad. That just adds more reason to legalizing Drugs. I have never heard of a Grocery Deal going bad, after all.
Admittedly a fairly weak analogy, but whatever.
If we are going to assume something, let's just assume he was a victim of armed robbery. After serving seventeen years for a crime he did not commit, I believe he has earned the benefit of the doubt.