- Feb 10, 2005
- 1,464
- 1,333
- 136
I have a few sites I frequent, this one being at the top, but the other is THG, mostly for the news and such. However, I did notice today a review of the P180. I thought the review was pretty much right on with what others have said about the case, except when he came to the comparisons of the CPU's. Granted this was supposedly an upgrade which included the CPU, but the thing that bothered me the most was the selection of the benchmarking program to measure CPU performance. He chose one. That's it, and based his whole remarks between a 4000+ and a 3.0Ghz Northwood on said program! I see serious flaws in the program selected and the number of benchmarks performed to measure CPU performance. I'm sure the program essentially measured clock speed as a high priority and, of course, gave the win to the Northwood. I'm not saying the Intel is a bad processor, it's just hard to believe the actual performance of both processors are right in line. Oh well, this is after all a rant. Post your thoughts.
Here's the linky:
http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/200509191/index.html
Here's the linky:
http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/200509191/index.html
