I'm not sure how far this discredits the wiki model. I mean, it was eventually found out and corrected. And I guess it mattered that it was in relation to an obscure field that most people didn't care much about (Medieval Russian history, and only from the point-of-view of Chinese-speakers at that). The sheer scale of it is just kind-of funny though.
Wasn't there another case of something similar with Wikipedia in the past? I can't remember what it was, but it was one guy making vast amounts of content up about some specialist subject that he didn't actually know anything about?
Generally I'm surprised and impressed that the Wikipedia approach works as well as it does.
www.vice.com
Wasn't there another case of something similar with Wikipedia in the past? I can't remember what it was, but it was one guy making vast amounts of content up about some specialist subject that he didn't actually know anything about?
Generally I'm surprised and impressed that the Wikipedia approach works as well as it does.
A Bored Chinese Housewife Spent Years Falsifying Russian History on Wikipedia
She “single-handedly invented a new way to undermine Wikipedia,” says a Wikipedian.