Another cop abuse case caught on video

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
If you don't think that the two "toy guns" didn't looked real, then you are either lying or just not very smart. The walmart case, the guy was told to put the gun down. He didn't. Don't go waving what looks like an assault weapon around a public store, disobey orders to put it down and expect it to go your way. Same for the kid in the park. The orange tip was taken off of it. It is there for a reason. Piss poor parenting is to blame, but of course they deflected the blame.

Calling me a racist and bigot is funny. You have no idea about my background, or life. So again I have no chance of being killed by police because of the previous reasons I listed.

Bigots are bigots. Cops executing people inside of 2 seconds is an execution. Not my fault if you are a bigot or refuse to watch the video. Time and time again we see videos of cop abuse and cop executions, all with people that didn't do anything wrong (except have to deal with a cop, which nowadays is often a lethal encounter)

Plenty of videos showing cops killing innocent people that did nothing wrong, and followed police commands. Funny thing, every time it happens, the cops all lied and said they were attacked, or some other lie to excuse their murder. Funny thing that....cops always lieing, and only the video gets them in trouble. It's almost like all cops will lie to protect each other, and kill innocent people and get away with it. But I guess in your (and xbiffx) world, that doesn't happen, it's always a "thug" that "went for a gun" which makes it a "good shot", another thug dead.

You have really shown your mental issues, from the "pansy" people to the "ass whupping" that you so dearly want to participate in, to all the "everyone is a thug and deserves what they get". Real great attitude you got there. Do you beat people you don't like as well? Seek professional help.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,486
529
126
Bigots are bigots. Cops executing people inside of 2 seconds is an execution. Not my fault if you are a bigot or refuse to watch the video. Time and time again we see videos of cop abuse and cop executions, all with people that didn't do anything wrong (except have to deal with a cop, which nowadays is often a lethal encounter)

Plenty of videos showing cops killing innocent people that did nothing wrong, and followed police commands. Funny thing, every time it happens, the cops all lied and said they were attacked, or some other lie to excuse their murder. Funny thing that....cops always lieing, and only the video gets them in trouble. It's almost like all cops will lie to protect each other, and kill innocent people and get away with it. But I guess in your (and xbiffx) world, that doesn't happen, it's always a "thug" that "went for a gun" which makes it a "good shot", another thug dead.

You have really shown your mental issues, from the "pansy" people to the "ass whupping" that you so dearly want to participate in, to all the "everyone is a thug and deserves what they get". Real great attitude you got there. Do you beat people you don't like as well? Seek professional help.

True they are, and I am not one. No matter how much you want to think I am. Just because we don't agree doesn't make it so. No matter how much you want it to be true.

I have said time and time again, officers should get punished when they do something wrong. Not every shoot is wrong. Not every shoot is a good shoot. Your sweeping generalization that all cops lie is just silly. But when you have a obvious hatred and an agenda you make things appear worse than they are. Like you do.

I have never said "everyone is a thug and deserve what they get", so stop making up quotes. You're flat out lying. Stating that some people need an ass beating, doesn't mean I need mental help. Some people do. The loud mouth douche bag in a public place, being belligerent and drunk. The bully who used his size and aggression to pray on others. There are endless examples.

Like I said, I have zero chance I will die by cop. For the many reasons I listed. I will not wave a gun around. I will not run away. I will not resist arrest after committing a crime and the officers trying to arrest me. Etc. My point is made, and I am done going around in circles. You're obviously just going to keep throwing insults and making up quotes that I never said, trying to twist my words. /done
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
I'm pointing out you are a fucking idiot for loudly proclaiming "justice" by saying the cop will get sued, when the law says he can't. Do you like being totally ignorant of reality?

The fact that you are so ignorant of that basic fact, but will proudly tell that it's true shows all of us that you really know nothing, and are just another ignorant bigot troll.

So you are now claiming that cops have "leeway"? Can you quote the law that says they are allowed to break someone's jaw while not being accused of a crime and also following a cop's commands and while not being a threat?

We will all wait with bated breath for your new reason to let the cop off.

For the last fucking time I never said this cop should get off! Get that through your dumbfuck brain! Where does the law say this cop can't be sued?

Nice strawman there on your other point. Did I say, anywhere, that the cop shouldn't be accused of a crime. Fucking retard reading comprehension strikes again.

Anyways, of course the police have leeway in executing their duties. If someone isn't complying with their orders, they are able to apply force when apprehending them. This is especially true when the cop feels like they are in danger. Why do you think the Ferguson incident ended up the way it did? I'm not even sure why you would debate that except that you are a complete cop hate filled dipshit. Google "police leeway" if you need further evidence.

Now what could be debated is what's the definition of complying. I would say that if you don't immediately follow a cop's order then you do so at your own peril. This is especially the case when you've been involved in a crime where a gun was commissioned. The cop has no idea why you are delaying but they are going to react in a matter that keeps them or others safe/alive. Your complete cop hate filled bias is showing with your continued statements regarding this matter. In this case, he wasn't immediately following orders from police. In fact they issued them a number of times. Oh and how do you know he wasn't a threat? How would those cops until they were able to search him?

And for the last fucking time this cop, in my opinion, took it too far. If this isn't clear enough, I can't help you. So go fuck yourself in that case.
 
Last edited:

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
For the last fucking time I never said this cop should get off! Get that through your dumbfuck brain! Where does the law say this cop can't be sued?

Nice strawman there on your other point. Did I say, anywhere, that the cop shouldn't be accused of a crime. Fucking retard reading comprehension strikes again.

Anyways, of course the police have leeway in executing their duties. If someone isn't complying with their orders, they are able to apply force when apprehending them. This is especially true when the cop feels like they are in danger. Why do you think the Ferguson incident ended up the way it did? I'm not even sure why you would debate that except that you are a complete cop hate filled dipshit. Google "police leeway" if you need further evidence.

Now what could be debated is what's the definition of complying. I would say that if you don't immediately follow a cop's order then you do so at your own peril. This is especially the case when you've been involved in a crime where a gun was commissioned. The cop has no idea why you are delaying but they are going to react in a matter that keeps them or others safe/alive. Your complete cop hate filled bias is showing with your continued statements regarding this matter. In this case, he wasn't immediately following orders from police. In fact they issued them a number of times. Oh and how do you know he wasn't a threat? How would those cops until they were able to search him?

And for the last fucking time this cop, in my opinion, took it too far. If this isn't clear enough, I can't help you. So go fuck yourself in that case.

Look, I know you are totally ignorant about the law based on your attempt to let the cop off with him "being sued", when in truth that cannot happen. You are ignorant, we get that, you have made that crystal clear.

A crime was committed, when the cop kicked him in the head. Do you disagree? We have clear video of the incident.

Do you think a crime was committed? Yes or No?

If yes, the cop should be punished for his crime right? So why are you defending the cop and letting him off with no punishment? He had no punishment, he wasn't fired, he wasn't charged, and he can't be sued. Just what punishment do you think he got?

So why not try a 2nd time to indict him? What is wrong with that? Or is this more of the "blame the victim" and just let a white cop off once again.
 

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
Like I said, I have zero chance I will die by cop. For the many reasons I listed. I will not wave a gun around. I will not run away. I will not resist arrest after committing a crime and the officers trying to arrest me. Etc. My point is made, and I am done going around in circles. You're obviously just going to keep throwing insults and making up quotes that I never said, trying to twist my words. /done

Trolls going to troll I guess. There area plenty of instances where cops have shot and/or killed innocent people doing nothing wrong. So you are incorrect once again. Unless you are a cop, and in that case, you are more likely to be killing innocent people, are protecting other cops killing innocent people.

You can google for plenty of videos of cops shooting people for no reason, so it's a clear lie by you that you cannot be killed by a cop. After that fallacy, well, your ideas keep going downhill after that.

I realize that you think the rest of the US are "pansy's" and need an "ass whupping", which really says it all about you. Another arm-chair warrior that proudly thinks they are a tough guy and can do what they want, and only those thugs will get killed, and since they are thugs, they get what they deserve. Good people (AKA white) don't have to worry about the cops killing you. Talk about dinosaur thinking and trolling.

Since according to you people need an "ass whupping", why do we have cops and judges? Lets just let you and others beat up anyone you feel isn't manly enough, or doing something wrong.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
Look, I know you are totally ignorant about the law based on your attempt to let the cop off with him "being sued", when in truth that cannot happen. You are ignorant, we get that, you have made that crystal clear.

A crime was committed, when the cop kicked him in the head. Do you disagree? We have clear video of the incident.

Do you think a crime was committed? Yes or No?

If yes, the cop should be punished for his crime right? So why are you defending the cop and letting him off with no punishment? He had no punishment, he wasn't fired, he wasn't charged, and he can't be sued. Just what punishment do you think he got?

So why not try a 2nd time to indict him? What is wrong with that? Or is this more of the "blame the victim" and just let a white cop off once again.

His case already went before a GJ and there was no indictment. I would say that there wasn't a crime committed in this case then. He didn't get off. He is being sued (its right in YOUR OP). This is a civil case, not criminal at that point. Keep ignoring my issues with having a second GJ convened which I've plainly stated more than once. And go fuck yourself.

We are done here.
 
Last edited:

GarfieldtheCat

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2005
3,708
1
0
His case already went before a GJ and there was no indictment. I would say that there wasn't a crime committed in this case then. He didn't get off. He is being sued (its right in YOUR OP). This is a civil case, not criminal at that point. Keep ignoring my issues with having a second GJ convened which I've plainly stated more than once. And go fuck yourself.

We are done here.

Well, I guess you don't care about justice. You saw the video, clearly illegal, but are OK with letting the cop off. Gotcha.

Nice excuse to hide behind. kinda of like all those lynchings years ago of black people, and no one got charged. Guess those weren't illegal either. Funny people like you always defend the cops involving innocent black men.

Not surprised you support a white cop getting away with assault, despite clear video evidence. Even the DA agreed, since he convened a 2nd GJ. But you of course know way more then the DA, since you know that cops can get sued! Amazing ignorance on your part.

Since you continue to show your proud ignorance, let me help you. This is the FBI explaining qualified immunity, which means that basically all cops can't be sued. Read this and will have learned something for the day!

http://leb.fbi.gov/2012/september/qualified-immunity-how-it-protects-law-enforcement-officers

In Harlow v. Fitzgerald, the Court explained that “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”

Now stop lying and saying the cop is getting punished because of a lawsuit. He isn't. But hopefully he will be convicted of criminal charges for assault on an innocent person. But with bigots like you, we really can't count on justice since it only takes one xbiffx on the jury to say the thug deserved it, and let the cop off.