Andy Rooney calls Pat Robertson and Mel Gibson "Wackos"

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
I didn't see any comments of significance in there. The 30 min i saw of Mel's interview gave me the distinct impression that he is not a wacko.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.
Are you kidding or serious? The main jewish leader against the film right now doesn't even call mel anti-semetic, or the film anti semetic.

 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

The movie isn't about all this racist bullsh|t that everybody ELSE seems to be drumming up.
rolleye.gif
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
2
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.
Are you kidding or serious? The main jewish leader against the film right now doesn't even call mel anti-semetic, or the film anti semetic.

tnitsuj has yet to display anything resembling intelligent thought, there is no reason to expect him to start now.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out

not comparable. he was saying that he doesn't like people making money off religion.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/02/19/60minutes/rooney/main601254.shtml

It doesn't seem right, but religion has been in the news a lot recently.

Pat Robertson says that God has spoken to him and told him that George W. Bush will be re-elected because he deserves to be.

Here's Pat Robertson's exact quote: "I think George Bush is going to win in a walk. I'm hearing from the Lord that it's going to be a blowout."

The movie by Mel Gibson called ?The Passion of the Christ? is the other religious issue in the news. Everyone's talking about that. The question is whether the Jews killed Jesus Christ - who was Jewish, of course.

I hadn't wanted to say anything about this, because it seemed like a personal matter, but Pat Robertson isn't the only one who has heard from God.

I heard from God just the other night. God always seems to call at night.

"Andrew," God said to me. He always calls me "Andrew." I like that.

"Andrew, you have the eyes and ears of a lot of people. I wish you'd tell your viewers that both Pat Robertson and Mel Gibson strike me as wackos. I believe that's one of your current words. They're crazy as bedbugs, another earthly expression. I created bedbugs. I'll tell you, they're no crazier than people,? said God.

"Let me just say that I think I'd remember if I'd ever talked to Pat Robertson, and I'd remember if I said Bush would get re-elected in a blowout."

?As far as Mel Gibson goes, I haven't seen his movie, 'The Passion of the Christ,' because it hasn't opened up here yet. But I did catch Gibson being interviewed by Diane Sawyer. I did something right when I came up with her, didn't I,? added God. ?Anyway, as I was saying, Mel is a real nut case. What in the world was I thinking when I created him? Listen, we all make mistakes."

That is what God said to me. That's about all he did say to me because I'm sure God has a lot more important things to do than talk to someone on television.

My own question to Pat Robertson is this: The election looks as though it could be close, certainly not a blowout. If George W. Bush loses the election to a Democrat, will you become an atheist?

My question to Mel Gibson is: "How many million dollars does it look as if you're going to make off the crucifixion of Christ?"
-Andy Rooney
 

Danman

Lifer
Nov 9, 1999
13,134
0
0
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.
Are you kidding or serious? The main jewish leader against the film right now doesn't even call mel anti-semetic, or the film anti semetic.

tnitsuj has yet to display anything resembling intelligent thought, there is no reason to expect him to start now.

What do you expect? He's a troll.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
I call them BOTH (Pat and Mel) wackos simply for the fact that they believe in imaginary people. So yes, wackos is an accurate description of them. ;)
 

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Some people are gifted with overwhelming imaginations that they can translate cinematically, so I don't think Mel Gibson is any different than Peter Jackson in that regard; both had a text that served as the foundation of their creations.
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
Andy Rooney is a senile old man who likes to complain. He should be confined to a nursing home, wearing diapers.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out

not comparable. he was saying that he doesn't like people making money off religion.

Mel Gibson isn't in this to make money. He spent millions of his own money (that he most likely will not make back) to get this movie out. This is not a money-making venture.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
unless he funded the entire film, someone backing it with money expects to make money.
 

Amorphus

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2003
5,561
1
0
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out

not comparable. he was saying that he doesn't like people making money off religion.

Mel Gibson isn't in this to make money. He spent millions of his own money (that he most likely will not make back) to get this movie out. This is not a money-making venture.

He paid money out of his own pocket, but he will get it back. Have faith, right? :)
 

konichiwa

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,077
2
0
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out

not comparable. he was saying that he doesn't like people making money off religion.

Mel Gibson isn't in this to make money. He spent millions of his own money (that he most likely will not make back) to get this movie out. This is not a money-making venture.

Are you kidding? If there's one subject you can make a movie about that is guaranteed to bring back your investment, IT IS RELIGION. Believe me, Mel will make ALL his money back and a LOT more.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out

not comparable. he was saying that he doesn't like people making money off religion.

Mel Gibson isn't in this to make money. He spent millions of his own money (that he most likely will not make back) to get this movie out. This is not a money-making venture.

The movie cost $25million to make. Its projected to bring in $200million at the box office. Add on DVD's Mel Gibson will personally see $50-75million in profits, after everyone else gets their cut.
 

GoodRevrnd

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
6,801
581
126
Originally posted by: konichiwa
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I agree with that. Anti Semitic a$$holes.

I didn't hear anybody up in arms when Schindler's List came out

not comparable. he was saying that he doesn't like people making money off religion.

Mel Gibson isn't in this to make money. He spent millions of his own money (that he most likely will not make back) to get this movie out. This is not a money-making venture.

Are you kidding? If there's one subject you can make a movie about that is guaranteed to bring back your investment, IT IS RELIGION. Believe me, Mel will make ALL his money back and a LOT more.
If for no other reason than the hype that's surrounded this thing. I for one am curious to see it just to see what the big deal is and form my own opinion. :confused:

That said, movies are created to tell a story (well, okay... not always these days). Religion is rich in stories to tell, so tell me what you would rather see: The Fast & the Furious 3, or a potentially interesting interpretation of Jesus? I think those of you saying he's doing this to make $$$ are far too cynical.
 

konichiwa

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,077
2
0
Who said he's doing it just for money? I certainly didn't, and I'd agree that it may be a bit cynical to say so.

However, I think that as cynical as it is to argue that he's making it purely for money, it's far more obtuse to portray him as some sort of cinema martyr, bearing a cross of debt to fund a movie that he'll never make a return on.

He's going to be rolling in it even more than he is now after this movie. A movie like this will turn into an evangelical tool for years, not to mention its cinema and DVD sales.

He's no Don Quixote, people...
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
Rooney said God had spoken to him, saying, "I wish you'd tell your viewers that both Pat Robertson and Mel Gibson strike me as wackos."

LOL!