- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,041
- 8,734
- 136
Andrea Dick.
She lives with Mommy in Roselle Park, N.J. and loves to adorn Mommy's home with obscene anti-Biden banners. There's a town oridnance against displaying such obscenity. She's been ordered to take the three big banners that contain obscenity down, or face daily fines. She's appealing the decision.
However:
She lives with Mommy in Roselle Park, N.J. and loves to adorn Mommy's home with obscene anti-Biden banners. There's a town oridnance against displaying such obscenity. She's been ordered to take the three big banners that contain obscenity down, or face daily fines. She's appealing the decision.
However:
But Thomas Healy, a law professor at Seton Hall University with expertise in constitutional issues, disagreed.
Citing a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Cohen v. California, that turned on the question of whether the same word at issue in Ms. Dick’s case was obscene, Professor Healy said the word clearly did not qualify as obscene speech in the context of the political banners.