- Feb 17, 2014
- 69
- 2
- 71
i was reading anandtech's review about Crucial M500 under performance consistency and it claims that
i have never heard that claim anywhere else.
is there any validity on anandtech's claim about measly 28 IOPS or anandtech is a sell out to crucial to urge people to upgrade?
is there any way to reproduce the test they did?
source:
http://anandtech.com/show/6884/crucial-micron-m500-review-960gb-480gb-240gb-120gb/3
The improvement over the m4 is just insane though. Whereas the M500 sees its floor at roughly 2600 IOPS, the m4 will drop down to as low as 28 IOPS. That's slower than mechanical hard drive performance and around the speed of random IO in an mainstream ARM based tablet.
i have never heard that claim anywhere else.
is there any validity on anandtech's claim about measly 28 IOPS or anandtech is a sell out to crucial to urge people to upgrade?
is there any way to reproduce the test they did?
source:
http://anandtech.com/show/6884/crucial-micron-m500-review-960gb-480gb-240gb-120gb/3
