Evan, I'd like to see a true analysis of whether it in fact allows the end user to see the CPU diode temperature. The A7V333 does not. It does watch the CPU diode reading, but the reading never makes it past the C.O.P. ASIC. The end user gets estimated readings from a small thermistor soldered to the surface of the motherboard, and that is what you see in Asus Probe and in the BIOS. :|
For my testing methodology, I basically took an ice pack wrapped in a cloth and held it to the underside of the motherboard while watching the BIOS and Asus Probe readings. The temperatured dropped instantly and very rapidly in response to the cooling of the motherboard itself, showing that the BIOS reading and Asus Probe reading are in fact coming from a motherboard-mounted thermistor. By contrast, the reading rises and drops over a period of about two minutes when load is applied and removed on the CPU itself, and goes up and down only a little (about 4-6C). At this time, the only consumer boards actually reporting CPU-diode readings
to the user are the EPoXes and the rev. 2 Gigabyte 7VRXes.
Another trait of the A7V333 is its profound number of jumpers. You might comment on whether the A7V8X carries on this trend, or integrates more of them into the BIOS. For instance, enabling or disabling the onboard USB 2.0, FireWire and RAID controller on an A7V333-RAID is done by jumper, requiring the user to open the case. Asus seems to take devilish delight in putting some of the jumpers in crazy spots too. Hopefully the A7V8X has more of them in BIOS.
Another jumper-related issue is the DIMM voltage. The A7V333's have some undocumented DIMM-voltage jumpers by the rear end of the AGP slot, and by default they are overvoltage. Hmmm! Does the A7V8X do likewise? Enquiring minds want to know!
If you look at the AthlonXP 2600+ review at Ace's Hardware, you find that the AXP didn't fare well in SPECViewPerf:
link I'd be curious to see whether the whiz-bang AGP 8X makes any difference here, if you guys can manage that.