That's what I fear as well, many of the people who have graciously moved some power over to OGR moving back to the other projects, so we loose too much output.
Perhaps we can retain the K6 CPUs on the OGR project where they are most efficient 😉, and attract some of the SETI people to use OGR as a backup if they can't get SETI work work to do. In fact, I think that I'll set up one or more of my Celermines up to do SETI in blank-screen screen saver mode, with OGR running in the background during use. I've been dying to see how that 850 and 935 Celermines do at SETI, and I would like to see how this this dual project scenario actually works out on machines that otherwise get heavy use.
viz
[edit]
The_One -
Yes, I agree that it would be wonderfull to get TA into that #1 SETI spot. What do you think of that dual project idea? I can see where we can increase the overall TeAm efficiency if the SETI machines that use SS mode did a Dnet (RC5 or OGR) project while in active use, and work on SETI when not in use. Also, wouldn't that machine work on Dnet during those occasions when it could not connect to the SETI server, also putting otherwise lost CPU cycles to good use?
[/edit]